Skip to content

TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL DRT300 (REF DRT3000235)Recalls & reported problems

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · TEC ODYSSEY TOR II SMPCY 23.5D CYL3.00 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL (106)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474812604), received between Nov 25, 2025 and Mar 18, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Crack1
  • Mechanical Jam1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 18, 2026Scratched Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRELOADED MULTIFOCAL TORIC INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) EXHIBITS SIGNS OF SCRATCHING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NOTED DEVICE HAS BEEN OPENED AND NOT USED. IT IS UNKNOWN WHETHER THE TIP OF THE CARTRIDGE WAS DAMAGED, WHETHER ADDITIONAL RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING LENS DELIVERY, OR WHETHER THE CARTRIDGE CONTACTED THE EYE. THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE LENS SCRATCH COULD NOT BE CONFIRMED, AND IT IS UNKNOWN WHETHER THE OPTIC OR HAPTIC WAS DAMAGED. THE EXTENT OF PATIENT CONTACT IS ALSO UNKNOWN; HOWEVER, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE LENS WAS NOT IMPLANTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A BACKUP LENS, (THE SERIAL NUMBER OF THE REPLACEMENT LENS IS UNKNOWN). NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED, AND NO UNPLANNED MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS, SUCH AS VITRECTOMY, INCISION ENLARGEMENT, OR SUTURES, WERE REQUIRED. IT IS UNKNOWN WHETHER THE DEVICE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT, AND THE CURRENT PATIENT OUTCOME REMAINS UNKNOWN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24635327 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 25, 2025Crack; Mechanical Jam; Crack; Mechanical Jam

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS PROCEDURE WAS INTERRUPTED WHEN A PRELOADED CARTRIDGE FAILED TO ADVANCE THE LENS DURING INSERTION; THE CARTRIDGE TIP WAS DAMAGED AND CONTACTED THE PATIENT. THE LENS REMAINED STUCK IN THE CARTRIDGE. NO PATIENT INJURY OCCURRED AND NO FURTHER INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED; THE PATIENT REMAINED WELL. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23648677 ↗

Other Lens, multifocal intraocular devices

All Lens, multifocal intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page