Skip to content

TactiCath™ A-TCSE-JRecalls & reported problems

St. Jude Medical, Inc. · Contact Force Ablation Catheter · Class 3

All models of TactiCath (10)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05415067027702), received between Aug 6, 2018 and Jun 16, 2025 — classified as 8 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem8

Patient problems

  • Cardiac Perforation5
  • Arrhythmia1
  • Heart Block1
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
  • Nerve Damage1
  • Thrombosis/Thrombus1
  • Vascular Dissection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 16, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE FOLLOWING WAS PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA IN AN ARTICLE TITLED, "CLINICAL INSIGHTS INTO THE ROLE OF BEPRIDIL IN RECURRENCE PREVENTION AFTER ABLATION OF PERSISTENT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION"; MOYURU HIRATA MD1, 2025;41:E70083, HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1002/JOA3.70083. THIS RETROSPECTIVE STUDY INCLUDED 232 CONSECUTIVE PERAF PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT AF ABLATION BETWEEN 2014 AND 2019. AMONG THEM, 162 RECEIVED BEPRIDIL FOR 3 MONTHS POST-ABLATION (BEPRIDIL GROUP), WHILE 70 RECEIVED NO ANTIARRHYTHMIC DRUGS (NO-AADS GROUP). BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS, PROCEDURAL DETAILS, AND OUTCOMES WERE COMPARED. KAPLAN¿MEIER ANALYSIS AND COX REGRESSION MODELS WERE USED TO EVALUATE AF/ATRIAL TACHYCARDIA (AT) RECURRENCE, WITH BEPRIDIL USE TREATED AS A TIME-DEPENDENT COVARIABLE. THERE WERE 3 EVENTS OF CARDIAC TAMPONADE, 3 EVENTS OF SINUS NODE DYSFUNCTION, 1 EVENT OF PHRENIC NERVE PALSY, 1 EVENT OF MAJOR BLEEDING, AND 1 EVENT OF SICK SINUS SYNDROME.

    Patient problems: Arrhythmia; Cardiac Perforation; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Nerve Damage

    MAUDE report 22216674 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    MANUFACTURING REF: 3008452825-2023-00275. AT THE END OF AN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION PROCEDURE, A CARDIAC TAMPONADE WAS OBSERVED DURING RF IN THE LEFT PULMONARY VEINS WHICH REQUIRED DRAINAGE. DURING GENERAL ANESTHESIA THERE WAS LOW BLOOD PRESSURE FOR A PERIOD OF 15 MINUTES. THERE WERE NO ISSUES WHILE USING THE CATHETER. IT WAS POSSIBLE THAT A COMPLICATED TRANSSEPTAL ACCESS CAUSED IT. THE TAMPONADE WAS DIAGNOSED USING VIA AN ECHOCARDIOGRAM AND FLUOROSCOPY. A PERICARDIOCENTESIS WAS PERFORMED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO FURTHER ISSUES.

    Patient problems: Cardiac Perforation

    MAUDE report 17204538 ↗
  • InjuryJun 30, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    SINO-ATRIAL BLOCK HAPPENED AFTER AN ATRIAL TACHYCARDIA ABLATION IN THE RIGHT ATRIUM.

    Patient problems: Heart Block

    MAUDE report 14879003 ↗
  • InjuryJun 16, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE, A BLOOD CLOT WAS NOTED ON THE TIP OF THE CATHETER. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus

    MAUDE report 14718016 ↗
  • InjuryJun 15, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    DURING A VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA ABLATION PROCEDURE, A PERICARDIAL EFFUSION OCCURRED IN THE RIGHT VENTRICLE. THE PATIENT BECAME HYPOTENSIVE AND AN ECHOCARDIOGRAM REVEALED AN EFFUSION FOR WHICH A PERICARDIOCENTESIS WAS PERFORMED TO STABILIZE THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Cardiac Perforation

    MAUDE report 14697755 ↗
  • InjuryMar 31, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    DURING AN ABLATION PROCEDURE, AN AORTIC DISSECTION OCCURRED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S MENTAL STATE CHANGED DESPITE NO CHANGE IN ANESTHESIA LEVELS. THE VENTRICULAR ACCESS WAS DIFFICULT TO ACHIEVE VIA THE RETROGRADE APPROACH (THROUGH THE AORTA). THE PATIENT HAD PREVIOUS AORTIC VALVE REPAIR AND HAD TORTUOUS AORTIC ANATOMY. IT WAS INDICATED AN EMBOLIZATION COULD HAVE CAUSED A STROKE, AND THE CASE WAS TERMINATED. A STROKE WAS NEVER CONFIRMED. A CT SCAN WAS ADMINISTERED AND A DISSECTED AORTA WAS DIAGNOSED, NEAR THE STENOSED AREA OF THE AORTIC ARCH. THE PATIENT WAS TO BE FOLLOWED AT ANOTHER FACILITY AND A STENT WAS IMPLANTED TO STABILIZE THE PATIENT. THERE WERE NO PERFORMANCE ISSUES WITH ANY ABBOTT DEVICE.

    Patient problems: Vascular Dissection

    MAUDE report 9903859 ↗
  • InjuryApr 15, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    FOLLOWING A SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA ABLATION, A PERICARDIAL EFFUSION OCCURRED. THE ABLATION PROCEDURE WAS FOR A CONCEALED LEFT LATERAL BYPASS TRACT. TRANSSEPTAL ACCESS WAS OBTAINED AND ABLATION WAS PERFORMED SUCCESSFULLY WHICH ELIMINATED THE LATERAL BYPASS TRACT. POST PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS HYPOTENSIVE. A PERICARDIAL EFFUSION WAS OBSERVED ON FLUOROSCOPY AND AN ECHOCARDIOGRAM WAS USED TO CONFIRM THE EFFUSION. NO INTERVENTION WAS NEEDED TO TREAT THE EFFUSION. THE PHYSICIAN BELIEVED THE PERICARDIAL EFFUSION WAS DUE TO ABLATING AT 50 WATTS. THERE WERE NO PERFORMANCE ISSUES WITH ANY ABBOTT DEVICE.

    Patient problems: Cardiac Perforation

    MAUDE report 8513769 ↗
  • InjuryAug 6, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    RELATED MANUFACTURER NUMBER: 2030404-2018-00055, 3008452825-2018-00265. AT THE END OF THE ATRIAL FIBRILLATION PROCEDURE, A PERICARDIAL EFFUSION OCCURRED. AFTER ISOLATING THE VEINS THE PATIENT BECAME HYPOTENSIVE. AN ECHOCARDIOGRAM REVEALED A PERICARDIAL EFFUSION FOR WHICH A PERICARDIOCENTESIS WAS PERFORMED TO STABILIZE THE PATIENT. THERE WERE NO PERFORMANCE ISSUES WITH ANY ABBOTT DEVICE.

    Patient problems: Cardiac Perforation

    MAUDE report 7755374 ↗

Other Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation devices

All Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page