Skip to content

TriMark TRIMARK TD 3609Recalls & reported problems

Hologic, Inc. · TriMark TrapDoor (TD) · Class 2 · Implant

All models of TriMark (9)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05420045503307), received between Mar 28, 2019 and Aug 6, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Component Missing” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Component Missing4
  • Material Fragmentation3
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient4
  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 6, 2026Material Fragmentation

    It was reported on July 20, 2026 that during a procedure with a Trimark that "When the marker was used on a patient and inserted into the patient's breast, it opened and came apart, leaving a small piece of the marker inside the patient.". Customer outreach was performed and confirmed the patient did not suffer any additional harm, and there was no additional medical or surgical intervention required as a result of the retained fragment. There are no post-procedure images available and no further information is available at this time.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50165687 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 3, 2024Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024, FOLLOWING A PATIENT´S OPERATION AN X-RAY OF THE SPECIMEN REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT, REVEALED THAT A PIECE OF THE MATERIAL USED TO INSERT THE CLIP WAS ALSO PRESENT IN THE TUMOR ADDITIONALLY TO THE CLIP. THE PIECE OF MATERIAL WAS THERE SINCE IMPLANTATION ON (B)(6) 2024. THERE WERE NO NOTICEABLE INCIDENTS DURING THE EXAMINATION APART SOME RESISTANCE WHEN REMOVING THE MATERIAL TO INSERT THE CLIP. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED AND NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 20835876 ↗
  • InjuryMar 8, 2024Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6), WAS NOTICED THAT THE TRIMARK TD MIGRATED FROM THE LOCATION WHERE IT WAS INSERTED, IN TWO SEPARATE OCCURRENCES. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18866464 ↗
  • InjuryDec 7, 2020Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AT THE END OF AN X-RAY GUIDED VAB, THE CANNULA OF THE BIOPSY MARKER SITE SYSTEM WAS INSERTED, FOLLOWING THE NORMAL PROCEDURE. DURING THE DEPLOYMENT OF THE MARKER CLIP, WHILE PRESSING THE PLUNGER, AS RECOMMENDED, THE USER REALIZED THAT THE CANNULA OF THE DEVICE WAS SHORTENED AND THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN. MAMMOGRAPHIC VIEWS FOLLOWED, WHICH SHOWED THAT A PART FROM THE MARKER CLIP, A BROKEN PART (17MM) OF THE DISTAL END OF THE DEVICE WAS VISUALISED WITHIN THE BREAST, NEXT TO THE CLIP. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND THE USER CONFIRMED THAT THERE WAS A MISSING PART OF THE CANNULA. BROKEN PART OF THE CANNULA DEVICE REMAINED WITHIN THE BREAST AND AN UNNECESSARY OPERATION MIGHT BE REQUIRED TO REMOVE IT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 10958495 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 2, 2019Component Missing; Component Missing

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER DEPLOYING THE MARKER, THERE WAS NO CLIP SEEN ON POST BIOPSY IMAGES. THE MARKER COULD NOT BE FOUND ANYWHERE. IT IS ASSUMED THAT THERE WAS NO MARKER INSIDE THE DEVICE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8855641 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 28, 2019Component Missing; Component Missing

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN DEPLOYING THE MARKER THERE WAS NO MARKER IN THE BIOPSY CAVITY. "WE INVESTIGATED THE DEPLOYMENT DEVICE AND NOTHING WAS FOUND IN SIDE THE DEVICE NEITHER". NO INJURY OR MISDIAGNOSIS WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8460806 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 28, 2019Component Missing; Component Missing

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN DEPLOYING THE MARKER THERE WAS NO MARKER IN THE BIOPSY CAVITY. "WE INVESTIGATED THE DEPLOYMENT DEVICE AND NOTHING WAS FOUND IN SIDE THE DEVICE NEITHER". NO INJURY OR MISDIAGNOSIS WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8460803 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 28, 2019Component Missing; Component Missing

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN DEPLOYING THE MARKER THERE WAS NO MARKER IN THE BIOPSY CAVITY. "WE INVESTIGATED THE DEPLOYMENT DEVICE AND NOTHING WAS FOUND IN SIDE THE DEVICE NEITHER". NO INJURY OR MISDIAGNOSIS WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8460799 ↗

Other MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE devices

All MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page