Skip to content

Scoreflex NC Scoring PTCA Catheter 622-204-1URecalls & reported problems

OrbusNeich Medical (ShenZhen) Co., Ltd. · Class 3

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 06934955936333), received between Jul 3, 2024 and Jul 11, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Deflate” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 2 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Deflate1
  • No Apparent Adverse Event1

Patient problems

  • Reduced Blood Flow1
  • Unspecified Heart Problem1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 11, 2024No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event

    A SCOREFLEX NC SCORING BALLOON WAS USED FOR TREATMENT OF A HEAVILY CALCIFIED, 85% STENOSED LESION IN MID LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY VIA RIGHT RADIAL APPROACH. A 6FR GUIDING CATHETER WAS USED TO DEPLOY THE BALLOON TO THE LESION. NO RESISTANCE WAS FELT WHILE ADVANCING THE BALLOON. THE SCOREFLEX WAS INFLATED AT NOMINAL PRESSURE IN MID LAD ARTERY TOTALLY OCCLUDING IT. THE SCOREFLEX COULD NOT BE DEFLATED. USING DIFFERENT INDEFLATORS, SYRINGES AND OTHER UNSPECIFIED DEVICES DID NOT RESOLVE THE ISSUE. WIRE CUTTERS FROM THE OPERATING ROOM (OR) WERE USED TO CUT THE BALLOON SHAFT AT THE HUB TO GET IT TO DEFLATE BUT THE BALLOON REMAINED INFLATED. A GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER WAS PLACED OVER THE CUT SHAFT TO WEDGE THE BALLOON DOWN AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. WITH SOME GENTLE PULLING, THEY WERE ABLE TO GET THE BALLOON TO THE GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER AND PULLED THE WHOLE SYSTEM OUT TOGETHER. THE USE OF THE GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER WAS UNPLANNED AND REACTIVE TO THE BALLOON NOT DEFLATING. THE BALLOON REMAINED INFLATED HOURS LATER DESPITE THE CUT SHAFT. TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE, BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY AND STENT PLACEMENT WERE PERFORMED USING ABBOTT BMW GUIDE WIRE FOR DEVICE DELIVERY. THERE WAS A THR

    Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem

    MAUDE report 19718052 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2024Failure to Deflate; Failure to Deflate

    A SCOREFLEX NC SCORING BALLOON WAS USED FOR TREATMENT OF A HEAVILY CALCIFIED, 85% STENOSED LESION IN MID LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY VIA RIGHT RADIAL APPROACH. A 6FR GUIDING CATHETER WAS USED TO DEPLOY THE BALLOON TO THE LESION. NO RESISTANCE WAS FELT WHILE ADVANCING THE BALLOON. THE SCOREFLEX WAS INFLATED AT NOMINAL PRESSURE IN MID LAD ARTERY TOTALLY OCCLUDING IT. THE SCOREFLEX COULD NOT BE DEFLATED. USING DIFFERENT INDEFLATORS, SYRINGES AND OTHER UNSPECIFIED DEVICES DID NOT RESOLVE THE ISSUE. WIRE CUTTERS FROM THE OPERATING ROOM (OR) WERE USED TO CUT THE BALLOON SHAFT AT THE HUB TO GET IT TO DEFLATE BUT THE BALLOON REMAINED INFLATED. A GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER WAS PLACED OVER THE CUT SHAFT TO WEDGE THE BALLOON DOWN AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. WITH SOME GENTLE PULLING, THEY WERE ABLE TO GET THE BALLOON TO THE GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER AND PULLED THE WHOLE SYSTEM OUT TOGETHER. TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE, BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY AND STENT PLACEMENT WERE PERFORMED USING ABBOTT BMW GUIDE WIRE FOR DEVICE DELIVERY. THERE WAS A THREE-MINUTE DELAY TO THE PROCEDURE BUT NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Reduced Blood Flow

    MAUDE report 19671138 ↗

Other Catheter, Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (Ptca), Cutting/Scoring devices

All Catheter, Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (Ptca), Cutting/Scoring devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page