Skip to content

Sapphire II Pro 220-103-5UURecalls & reported problems

OrbusNeich Medical (ShenZhen) Co., Ltd. · Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 06934955942167), received between May 4, 2018 and May 4, 2018 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture1

Patient problems

  • Vascular Dissection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 4, 2018Material Rupture

    DURING AN ATHERECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON WAS INSERTED INTO THE PROXIMAL CIRCUMFLEX STENOSIS AND INFLATED ONCE. THE BALLOON RUPTURED IN THE PROXIMAL BRANCH, RESULTING IN A RETROGRADE DISSECTION AND SLOW FLOW INTO THE LEFT CIRCUMFLEX ARTERY. A STENT WAS DEPLOYED TO RESOLVE THE DISSECTION AND THE PATIENT WAS IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Vascular Dissection

    MAUDE report 7488184 ↗

Other Catheters, Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty, Percutaneous devices

All Catheters, Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty, Percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page