Skip to content

Sapphire II Pro 230-153-5UURecalls & reported problems

OrbusNeich Medical (ShenZhen) Co., Ltd. · Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 06934955942334), received between Jun 26, 2024 and Jul 10, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • Perforation of Vessels2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 10, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE (OAD) WAS USED FOR TREATMENT OF SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESIONS IN THE CIRCUMFLEX (CFX) ARTERY VIA FEMORAL APPROACH. THE PROXIMAL OSTIAL LESION WAS 70% STENOSED AND THE MID DISTAL LESION WAS 95% STENOSED. THE VESSEL DIAMETER WAS 3.5MM. SEVERAL LOW-SPEED TREATMENTS WERE PERFORMED. IMAGING WAS CHECKED POST ATHERECTOMY AND THE VESSEL LOOKED FINE. A 3.0 X 15MM SAPPHIRE II PRO SZ BALLOON WAS ADVANCED TO THE LESION AND INFLATED THREE TIMES. THE FIRST INFLATION WAS 12 ATMOSPHERES (ATM) FOR FIFTEEN SECONDS. THE SECOND INFLATION WAS 8 ATM FOR TEN SECONDS. THE THIRD INFLATION WAS 8 ATM FOR TWENTY SECONDS. FOLLOWING ANGIOPLASTY, IMAGING WAS CHECKED, AND A PERFORATION WAS OBSERVED. COVERED-STENT PLACEMENT WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT THE PERFORATION. A SECOND STENT WAS PLACED TO COVER THE LESION. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE. IN THE OPINION OF THE PHYSICIAN, THE EVENT WAS DUE TO PATIENT'S ANATOMY. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED HOME ON (B)(6) 2024 AFTER A PLANNED OVERNIGHT STAY AT THE HOSPITAL UNRELATED TO THE REPORTED PERFORATION.

    Patient problems: Perforation of Vessels

    MAUDE report 19711734 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE (OAD) WAS USED FOR TREATMENT OF SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESIONS IN THE CIRCUMFLEX (CFX) ARTERY VIA FEMORAL APPROACH. THE PROXIMAL OSTIAL LESION WAS 70% STENOSED AND THE MID DISTAL LESION WAS 95% STENOSED. THE VESSEL DIAMETER WAS 3.5MM. SEVERAL LOW-SPEED TREATMENTS WERE PERFORMED. IMAGING WAS CHECKED POST ATHERECTOMY AND THE VESSEL LOOKED FINE. A 3.0 X 15MM SAPPHIRE II PRO SZ BALLOON WAS ADVANCED TO THE LESION AND INFLATED THREE TIMES. THE FIRST INFLATION WAS 12 ATMOSPHERES (ATM) FOR FIFTEEN SECONDS. THE SECOND INFLATION WAS 8 ATM FOR TEN SECONDS. THE THIRD INFLATION WAS 8 ATM FOR TWENTY SECONDS. FOLLOWING ANGIOPLASTY, IMAGING WAS CHECKED, AND A PERFORATION WAS OBSERVED. COVERED-STENT PLACEMENT WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT THE PERFORATION. A SECOND STENT WAS PLACED TO COVER THE LESION. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE. IN THE OPINION OF THE PHYSICIAN, THE EVENT WAS DUE TO PATIENT'S ANATOMY. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED HOME ON (B)(6) 2024. BACKGROUND: LESION INFORMATION: CIRCUMFLEX ARTERY (PROXIMAL OSTIAL LESION 70% AND MID-DISTAL LESION 95% STENOSED, SEVERELY CALCIFIED). THE VESSEL DIAMETER WAS 3.5MM. PATIENT COMPLICATION: VESSEL PERFORATION. THE BALL

    Patient problems: Perforation of Vessels

    MAUDE report 19612025 ↗

Other Catheters, Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty, Percutaneous devices

All Catheters, Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty, Percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page