Skip to content

BioProtect Balloon Implant™ System 5135Recalls & reported problems

Bioprotect Ltd · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07290014878020), received between Feb 26, 2026 and Sep 13, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult or Delayed Positioning” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 2 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Difficult or Delayed Positioning2
  • Malposition of Device2
  • No Apparent Adverse Event1

Patient problems

  • Urinary Retention4
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding2
  • Perforation2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 13, 2026Difficult or Delayed Positioning

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Urinary Retention

    MAUDE report 50747514 ↗
  • InjurySep 13, 2026Malposition of Device

    Patient problems: Perforation

    MAUDE report 50747513 ↗
  • InjuryJul 2, 2026No Apparent Adverse Event

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BIOPROTECT LTD. THAT A BIOPROTECT BALLOON IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026. DURING PLANNING CT ON (B)(6) 2026 IT WAS FOUND THAT THE BALLOON APPEARANCE ON CT WAS NOT AS EXPECTED. A DISCUSSION WITH THE PHYSICIAN REVEALED THAT THE BALLOON WAS INTENTIONALLY FILLED WITH CONTRAST MEDIA RATHER THAN SALINE AS SPECIFIED IN THE PRODUCT'S INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (ALSO EMPHASIZED DURING PHYSICIAN'S TRAINING). THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE WHERE THE CONTRAST MEDIA WAS REMOVED FROM THE BALLOON AND REPLACED WITH SALINE. THE INVESTIGATION FINDINGS SUGGEST THAT THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE EVENT IS RELATED TO ABNORMAL USE RATHER THAN TO A DEVICE-RELATED ISSUE. THE PATIENT DID NOT PRESENT ANY CLINICAL SYMPTOMS, AND HIS RADIATION TREATMENT WAS DELAYED FOR APPROXIMATELY 1 MONTH.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25688861 ↗
  • InjuryMay 19, 2026Malposition of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BIOPROTECT LTD. THAT A BIOPROTECT BALLOON IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026. ULTRASOUND VISUALIZATION WAS POOR DUE TO PATIENT'S INSUFFICIENT BOWEL PREPARATION AND THIN RECTAL WALL. DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION (DRE) AND CT FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE CONFIRMED THE BALLOON WAS PLACED IN THE LUMEN OF THE RECTUM. THE PATIENT WAS REFERRED TO A LOCAL ER WHERE THE BALLOON WAS SUBSEQUENTLY ASPIRATED AND REMOVED. A 5 MM PUNCTURE IN THE RECTAL WALL WAS REPAIRED BY A COLORECTAL SURGEON. THE PATIENT IS EXPECTED TO RECEIVE A REPLACEMENT SPACER, AND HIS RADIATION TREATMENT WAS DELAYED.

    Patient problems: Perforation

    MAUDE report 25216898 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Difficult or Delayed Positioning

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BIOPROTECT LTD. ON (B)(6) 2026 THAT A BIOPROTECT BALLOON IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026. THE PROCEDURE WAS DONE UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF FIDUCIAL MARKERS. DURING THE PROCEDURE, MULTIPLE PLACEMENT ATTEMPTS WERE REQUIRED AFTER AN INITIAL TRACT EXTENDED BEYOND THE PROSTATIC APEX AND ENGAGED THE POSTERIOR CAPSULE. THE BALLOON WAS ULTIMATELY DEPLOYED IN AN ACCEPTABLE POSITION. POST-PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT DEVELOPED URINARY RETENTION REQUIRING FOLEY CATHETER PLACEMENT, WHICH RESOLVED WITHIN 48 HOURS. PLANNING MRI (B)(6) 2026), IMAGING RAISED CONCERN FOR HEMATOMA AND POSSIBLE VASCULAR INJURY. SUBSEQUENT DYNAMIC CONTRAST MRI SUGGESTED A PERIPROSTATIC ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA, AND THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SUCCESSFUL COIL EMBOLIZATION WITH RESOLUTION OF THE VASCULAR ABNORMALITY. THE REMAINING PELVIC VASCULATURE WAS UNREMARKABLE. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED FOR 24-HOUR OBSERVATION AND WAS REPORTED TO BE FINE. HIS RADIATION TREATMENT (SBRT) HAS BEEN DELAYED, AND NEW PLANNING IMAGING WILL BE SCHEDULED.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Urinary Retention

    MAUDE report 24730457 ↗
  • InjuryMar 16, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    MFR REPORT #: 3014285231-2026-00002 IT WAS REPORTED TO BIOPROTECT LTD. ON (B)(6) 2026 THAT A BIOPROTECT BALLOON IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026. THE PROCEDURE WAS DONE UNDER MONITORED ANESTHESIA CARE (MAC)FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF FIDUCIAL MARKERS AND COMPLETED AS EXPECTED. ON SIMULATION CT PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A DISTENDED BLADDER. A FOLEY CATHETER WAS PLACED AND THE PATIENT WAS PRESCRIBED FLOMAX. ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PHYSICIAN PARTIALLY ASPIRATED THE BALLOON, AND THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED. THE PATIENT'S SYMPTOMS WERE RELIEVED, AND HE STARTED HIS RADIATION TREATMENT AS PLANNED WITH NO DELAY.

    Patient problems: Urinary Retention

    MAUDE report 24613690 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BIOPROTECT LTD. ON (B)(6) 2026 THAT A BIOPROTECT BALLOON IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026. THE PROCEDURE WAS DONE UNDER MONITORED ANESTHESIA CARE (MAC)FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF FIDUCIAL MARKERS AND COMPLETED AS EXPECTED. ON SIMULATION CT PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A DISTENDED BLADDER. A FOLEY CATHETER WAS PLACED AND THE PATIENT WAS PRESCRIBED FLOMAX. ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PHYSICIAN PARTIALLY ASPIRATED THE BALLOON, AND THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED. THE PATIENT'S SYMPTOMS WERE RELIEVED, AND HE STARTED HIS RADIATION TREATMENT AS PLANNED WITH NO DELAY.

    Patient problems: Urinary Retention

    MAUDE report 24454146 ↗

Other Hydrogel Spacer devices

All Hydrogel Spacer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page