NIRxcell CoCr Coronary Stent on RX System NXL35017USRecalls & reported problems
Medinol Ltd. · Class 3 · Implant
All models of NIRxcell CoCr Coronary Stent on RX System (17)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07290107010955), received between Oct 13, 2016 and May 24, 2018 — classified as 1 death, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Failure to Advance1
Patient problems
- Cardiac Arrest1
- Death1
- Myocardial Infarction1
- Sudden Cardiac Death1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
DeathMay 24, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
SUBJECT ID: (B)(6). DATE OF INDEX PROCEDURE: (B)(6) 2016. TIME TO EVENT (DAYS): 601 DAYS. THIS REPORT IS FOR SUBJECT (B)(6), AN (B)(6) MALE PARTICIPATING IN THE (B)(4) STUDY. ON (B)(6) 2016, DUE TO STABLE ANGINA (CCSC II), THE SUBJECT UNDERWENT INDEX PROCEDURE WITH DEPLOYMENT OF NIRXCELL STENT SYSTEM TO THE MIDDLE LAD TARGET DE NOVO, PRE-PROCEDURE TIMI FLOW WAS GRADE 3 WITH 75% STENOSIS, NO CALCIFICATION, RESIDUAL STENOSIS POST STENT DEPLOYMENT WAS 0% WITH TIMI 3 FLOW. LVEF WAS 55% ON (B)(6) 2016. ON (B)(6) 2017, THE SUBJECT EXPERIENCED CARDIAC ARREST. THE SUBJECT WAS BROUGHT TO ER BY EMS IN FULL CARDIAC ARREST WITH CPR IN PROGRESS AFTER SUBJECT'S FAMILY REPORTED SUBJECT PASSING OUT AT HOME. HIS VITAL SIGNS WERE 92.8 T, UNLABORED, 74/40. THE SUBJECT WAS INTUBATED, CHEST COMPRESSIONS INITIATED AND ACLS PROTOCOL INITIATED. THE SUBJECT EXPIRED IN THE ER ON (B)(6) 2017 AT 11:17. IN THE INVESTIGATOR'S OPINION, THE EVENT OF CARDIAC ARREST WAS CONSIDERED SEVERE IN INTENSITY, UNRELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE AND UNRELATED TO THE STUDY PROCEDURE. THE SPONSOR CONSIDERED THE EVENT OF CARDIAC ARREST ANTICIPATED, POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE AND UNRELATED TO THE INDEX PROCEDURE. SPONSOR CO
Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest; Death; Sudden Cardiac Death
MAUDE report 7540057 ↗MalfunctionOct 13, 2016Failure to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Failure to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON OCT 20, 2016: THE DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS RETRACTED THROUGH THE GUIDING CATHETER AND WAS REMOVED BY ITSELF NOT WITH THE GUIDING CATHETER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON OCTOBER 31, 2016: RESULTS OF THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION TOGETHER WITH THE CUSTOMER REPORT INDICATE THAT THE RETURNED PRODUCT WAS SUPPLIED MEETING SPECIFICATIONS. NO ANOMALIES WERE DETECTED THAT COULD ELUCIDATE THE CIRCUMSTANCES FOR THE CUSTOMER REPORTED FAILURE TO CROSS AND SUBSEQUENT STENT DISLODGEMENT AFTER REMOVAL OF THE SYSTEM FROM THE PATIENT. IT MAY BE SURMISED THAT THE REPORTED ISSUES ARE NOT RELATED TO MEDINOL MANUFACTURING PROCESSES. DEVICE INVESTIGATION REPORT IS ATTACHED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON NOVEMBER 8, 2016: INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE WAS REVIEWED. THE REVIEW NOTED THAT THE SYSTEM WAS RETRACTED BACK THROUGH THE GUIDING CATHETER AND NOT TOGETHER WITH THE GUIDING CATHETER AS INDICATED IN THE IFU. IN ADDITION NIRXCELL WAS USED IN THE ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION WHICH IS NOT INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE. DHR REVIEW REVEALED NO NEW INFORMATION THAT WOULD CHANGE THE INITIAL REPORT. THE REPORT IS ATTACHED. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS INADVERTENTLY OMITTED FROM THE INITIAL MDR REPORT:DE
Patient problems: Myocardial Infarction
MAUDE report 6025458 ↗
Other Stent, Coronary devices
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965403130Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY35 reports
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965402130Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY23 reports
- Tryton Side Branch Stent T5-2530-191-USTryton Medical, Inc. · Stent, Coronary1 death22 reports
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965403330Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY21 reports
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965403320Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY10 reports
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965403120Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY9 reports
- Tryton Side Branch Stent T5-3035-151-USTryton Medical, Inc. · Stent, Coronary2 deaths7 reports
- MULTI-LINK VISION 1007850-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, CORONARY7 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page