EluNIR idaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System LUN350R12USRecalls & reported problems
Medinol Ltd. · Class 3 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07290107013895), received between Dec 22, 2019 and Dec 22, 2019 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deformation Due to Compressive Stress” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 22, 2019Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Physical Resistance/Sticking
ACCORDING TO INITIAL REPORT RECEIVED ON AUG 25, 2019: ON (B)(6) 2019, THE PHYSICIAN PERFORMED A CORONARY INTERVENTION ON A (B)(6) FEMALE PATIENT. A 3.5 X 12 ELUNIR WAS SELECTED TO TREAT A CORONARY LESION. IT WAS EXPLAINED TO THE REPORTER THAT THE STENT WAS PREPPED IN USUAL FASHION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ELUNIR IFU, UPON PLACING THE STENT ONTO THE .014 INTERVENTIONAL CORONARY WIRE AND INSERTION INTO THE GUIDE CATHETER, THE 3.5 X 12 ELUNIR BECAME STUCK ON THE WIRE INSIDE OF THE GUIDE CATHETER. THE SCRUB TECH AND THE PHYSICIAN WERE UNABLE TO ADVANCE THE STENT ON THE WIRE NOR REMOVE THE STENT FROM THE WIRE. THEREFORE, THE .014 INTERVENTIONAL CORONARY WIRE ALONG WITH THE 3.5 X 12 ELUNIR WERE REMOVED AS A UNIT. THE VESSEL WAS RE-WIRED WITH A NEW .014 INTERVENTIONAL CORONARY WIRE AND TREATED WITH ANOTHER STENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. ADDITIONAL DATE RECEIVED ON SEP. 25, 2019 FROM CORDIS - CARDINAL HEALTH CO.: THE DEVICE WAS STORED IN THE LAB, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IFU. THE PRODUCT WAS STORED AND HANDLED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THERE WASN'T ANY REPORTED DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE PRODUCT FROM THE PACKAGING. THERE WASN'T ANY DAMAGE NOTED TO THE PRODUCT UPON INSPECTI
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9508604 ↗
Other Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent devices
- SYNERGY™ H7493926038300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent8 deaths124 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent7 deaths106 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926020300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent9 deaths90 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016250Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths82 reports
- XIENCE Sierra™ 1550350-33Abbott Vascular Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent1 recall32 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30022UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths76 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926024300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths75 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30015UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths73 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page