Zygomatic Implant NM-F4452Recalls & reported problems
Noris Medical Ltd · Zygomatic, D4.2, L52.5, Int. Hex Ti. Implant · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Zygomatic Implant (12)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07290108812381), received between May 9, 2024 and Apr 19, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate4
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant4
- Implant Pain2
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 19, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 . ON (B)(6) 2026 , LOOSENING OF IMPLANT NOT RELATED TO BONE INGROWTH WAS VERIFIED. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT IS A HEALTHY. OBSERVED DURING THE EVENT: PAIN. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 24921064 ↗InjuryApr 16, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOOSENING OF IMPLANT NOT RELATED TO BONE INGROWTH WAS VERIFIED. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT IS A HEALTHY. OBSERVED DURING THE EVENT: PAIN. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 24895106 ↗InjuryApr 28, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT NM-F4452 LOT#0025022 IMPLANT LACKED PRIMARY STABILITY ON TOOTH #3. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DURING IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH NO REPORT OF OBSERVABLE CLINICAL SYMPTOMS. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO OTHER MEDICAL ISSUES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 21917608 ↗InjuryApr 28, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT NM-F4452 LOT#0025022 IMPLANT LACKED PRIMARY STABILITY ON TOOTH #3. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DURING IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH NO REPORT OF OBSERVABLE CLINICAL SYMPTOMS. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO OTHER MEDICAL ISSUES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 21917530 ↗InjuryOct 13, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT NM-F4452 LOT#0022398 IMPLANT LACKED PRIMARY STABILITY. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DURING IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH NO REPORT OF OBSERVABLE CLINICAL SYMPTOMS. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT IS SMOKER. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO OTHER MEDICAL ISSUES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 20435713 ↗InjurySep 1, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT NM-F4452 LOT#0026704 IMPLANT LACKED PRIMARY STABILITY ON TOOTH #2 DUE TO LOW TORQUE. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DURING IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH NO REPORT OF OBSERVABLE CLINICAL SYMPTOMS. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT IS HEALTHY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO OTHER MEDICAL ISSUES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 20115344 ↗InjuryMay 9, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL REPORTS THE IMPLANT FAILED, HOWEVER BASED ON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION THE EXACT ISSUE COULD NOT BE IDENTIFIED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 19276735 ↗
Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page