Tuff Implant NM-F6011Recalls & reported problems
Noris Medical Ltd · Tuff, D6.0, L11.5, Int. Hex Ti. Implant · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Tuff Implant (33)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07290108812565), received between Mar 19, 2025 and Mar 24, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate2
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
- Loss of Osseointegration2
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant5
- Osteolysis2
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 24, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOOSENING OF IMPLANT NOT RELATED TO BONE INGROWTH WAS VERIFIED. OBSERVED DURING THE EVENT: MOBILITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 24674502 ↗InjuryMar 23, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOOSENING OF IMPLANT NOT RELATED TO BONE INGROWTH WAS VERIFIED. OBSERVED DURING THE EVENT: MOBILITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 24662444 ↗InjuryMar 27, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT NM-F6011 LOT#9000287 IMPLANT LACKED PRIMARY STABILITY. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DURING IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH NO REPORT OF OBSERVABLE CLINICAL SYMPTOMS. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT IS HEALTHY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO OTHER MEDICAL ISSUES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 21706184 ↗InjuryMar 27, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT NM-F6011 LOT#9000287 IMPLANT LACKED PRIMARY STABILITY. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DURING IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH NO REPORT OF OBSERVABLE CLINICAL SYMPTOMS. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT IS HEALTHY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO OTHER MEDICAL ISSUES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 21706123 ↗InjuryMar 19, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS REPORTED ON TOOTH #15. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT HAS HYPERTENSION. OBSERVED DURING THE EVENT: BONE LOSS, MOBILITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 21640996 ↗InjuryMar 19, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS REPORTED ON TOOTH #15. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT HAS HYPERTENSION. OBSERVED DURING THE EVENT: BONE LOSS, MOBILITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Osteolysis
MAUDE report 21640746 ↗
Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page