Tuff TT Implant NM-F6111Recalls & reported problems
Noris Medical Ltd · Tuff TT, D6.0, L11.5, Int. Hex Ti. Implant · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Tuff TT Implant (15)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07290108812619), received between May 6, 2025 and May 6, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate2
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 6, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT SURGEON UNABLE TO GET APPROPRIATE TORQUE ON IMPLANT SITE #4, NM-F6111, LOT#9000948 IMPLANT LACKED PRIMARY STABILITY. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DURING IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH NO REPORT OF OBSERVABLE CLINICAL SYMPTOMS. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT HAS HYPERTENSION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO OTHER MEDICAL ISSUES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 21967747 ↗InjuryMay 6, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT SURGEON UNABLE TO GET APPROPRIATE TORQUE ON IMPLANT SITE #4, NM-F6111, LOT#9000948 IMPLANT LACKED PRIMARY STABILITY. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DURING IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH NO REPORT OF OBSERVABLE CLINICAL SYMPTOMS. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT HAS HYPERTENSION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO OTHER MEDICAL ISSUES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 21967654 ↗
Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page