Skip to content

Slimline SIS 200 FiberRecalls & reported problems

Lumenis Ltd. · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07290109140223), received between Feb 25, 2020 and Sep 18, 2025 — classified as 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4
  • Defective Device2
  • Material Fragmentation2
  • Power Problem2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 18, 2025Power Problem; Power Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE FIBER WAS CONNECTED, AND IT STOPPED WORKING. DUE TO THIS, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED FIBER REVEALED NO LIGHT WAS EXITING THROUGH CONNECTOR INDICATING AN INTERNAL CONNECTOR FRACTURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23088752 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A URETEROSCOPY PROCEDURE, THE FIBER POPPED WHILE USING IT AND WAS NOT SALVAGEABLE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE WITH NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22472884 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 21, 2024Defective Device; Defective Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ROUTINE REPROCESSING OF THE REUSABLE FIBER, THE TECH NOTICED LASER BURNS AND BLACK SPOTS ON THE FIBER. A SECOND FIBER WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITH NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE IDENTIFIED A FIBER CONNECTOR FRACTURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20275490 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 22, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY PROCEDURE, THE FIBER BROKE IN TWO AFTER IT WAS STERILIZED TWICE. DUE TO THIS, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19159959 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 31, 2023Break; Power Problem; Break; Power Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS FOUND THAT BOTH THE FIBER AND DEBRIS SHIELD WERE BROKEN. THE FIBER WAS BROKEN AT THE FIBER TIP, AND THEN THE FIBER STOPPED WORKING. IT WAS NOTED THERE WERE NO DEVICE ISSUE WITH CONNECTING THE FIBER TO THE CONSOLE AND THE FIBER WAS RECOGNIZED BY THE CONSOLE WHEN IT WAS CONNECTED. THIS REPORT IS FOR THE FIBER BREAK.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18039377 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 5, 2023Break; Defective Device; Break; Defective Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A URETEROSCOPY PROCEDURE FOR URINARY STONE REMOVAL, THE FIBER MADE A POPPING SOUND AND DID NOT WORK. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17686299 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 5, 2020Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    A USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE IN WHICH A LUMENIS SLIMLINE SIS 200 FIBER WAS BEING UTILIZED , THE FIBER TIP BROKE IN THE PATIENT'S KIDNEY. NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY WAS RECEIVED, NOR WAS THE EVENT REPORTED TO HAVE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO ANY CHANGE IN THE PATIENT'S CONDITION. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USE OF A NEW FIBER.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9792140 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 25, 2020Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    A FOREIGN USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A TUL PROCEDURE IN WHICH A LUMENIS SLIMLINE 200 REUSABLE FIBER WAS BEING UTILIZED , 10MM OF THE FIBER TIP BROKE AND REMAINED INSIDE THE KIDNEY. THE FRAGMENT WAS REMOVED USING A BASKET FORCEPS. NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY WAS RECEIVED, AND NO REPORT THAT THE EVENT CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO ANY CHANGE IN THE PATIENT'S CONDITION.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9748993 ↗

Other Powered Laser Surgical Instrument devices

All Powered Laser Surgical Instrument devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page