SlimLine™ SlimLine™ SIS 200Recalls & reported problems
Lumenis Ltd. · Class 2
All models of SlimLine (8)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Lumenis SlimLine laser is a powered laser used in surgery. The 235 reports most often describe parts breaking, connection problems and non-standard parts. The reports include 2 injuries and no deaths, and a few mention burns. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 225
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 225 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07290109145556), received between Aug 23, 2022 and Sep 29, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 223 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (97 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break97
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem57
- Defective Device52
- Nonstandard Device31
- Use of Device Problem12
- Connection Problem10
- Firing Problem10
- Material Integrity Problem10
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions222
- Burn(s)2
- Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn1
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 225 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 29, 2026Material Integrity Problem
After unpacked, during the inspection, it was found that the fiber was not transparent and damaged. The case was completed with another of same device. No patient complications. Analysis of the returned device identified an internal connector fracture.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50927640 ↗MalfunctionSep 28, 2026Thermal Decomposition of Device; Nonstandard Device
It was reported that during a Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) procedure, this fiber was initially used with power settings of 1 Joule and 10 Hz. During the procedure, the physician requested an increase in frequency to 15 Hz while maintaining the same energy level. Immediately following the frequency increase, an audible sound was noted, and the laser fiber tip was found to be burnt. The blast shield was also observed to be damaged. The fiber had no physical break. The procedure was stopped, the fiber was withdrawn, and another machine and fiber were used to complete the procedure. No patient complications were reported. Analysis of the returned device identified a connector fractured.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50918057 ↗MalfunctionSep 25, 2026Break
It was reported that during a stone fragmentation procedure to treat calculus in the kidney, the fiber tip fractured inside the patient. No fiber fragments fell inside the patient. The procedure was completed with a fiber replacement. The patient's condition following procedure was stable; there were no patient complications. There were no injuries to the operator of the fiber.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50896618 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2026Material Integrity Problem
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50828987 ↗MalfunctionSep 17, 2026Material Integrity Problem
It was reported that during procedure, the fiber was connected; however, the fiber was damaged, so the laser could not be used. The case was completed with a different device without patient complications. Analysis of the returned device identified a broken tip.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50808333 ↗MalfunctionSep 17, 2026Thermal Decomposition of Device; Nonstandard Device
It was reported that during a Removal of kidney stone procedure, when the fiber was connected and the laser activation began, the fiber tip burned out. The case was completed with a different device without patient complications. Analysis of the returned device identified an internal connector fracture.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50797106 ↗MalfunctionSep 11, 2026Break; Separation Problem
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50741475 ↗MalfunctionSep 8, 2026Break
It was reported that during a holmium laser therapy procedure, during the first use, the fiber broke as soon as the console was activated. The procedure was completed with another fiber without patient complications.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50674131 ↗MalfunctionAug 3, 2026Break
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50122262 ↗MalfunctionJul 30, 2026Break
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50090526 ↗MalfunctionJun 23, 2026Nonstandard Device; Connection Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FIBER WAS NOT RECOGNIZED BY THE CONSOLE. THERE WERE NO PROCEDURE AND PATIENT OUTCOME REPORTED. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE IDENTIFIED A FIBER BODY BROKEN
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25602317 ↗MalfunctionJun 23, 2026Power Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LITHOTRIPSY PROCEDURE, THE FIBER COULD NOT BE USED AFTER IT SUDDENLY MADE AN ABNORMAL NOISE. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF SAME DEVICE. THE PATIENTS CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE IDENTIFIED AN INTERNAL FRACTURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25589476 ↗MalfunctionJun 22, 2026Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FIBERS HAVE BEEN DAMAGING THE DEBRIS SHIELDS, AND ABNORMAL DEGRADATION OF THE DEBRIS SHIELDS HAS BEEN OBSERVED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED FIBER IDENTIFIED THAT THE FIBER TIP WAS BROKEN. THIS REPORT REFERS TO FIFTH FIBER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25588147 ↗MalfunctionJun 17, 2026Nonstandard Device; Communication or Transmission Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE WHEN THE FIBER WAS CONNECTED FOR THE THIRD STERILIZATION CYCLE, THE ERROR 54 (FIBER ERROR) OCCURRED. IT WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER REUSABLE FIBER, BUT THE SAME ERROR RECURRED. AFTER REPEATEDLY DISCONNECTING AND RECONNECTING THE CONNECTION POINT, THE FIBER BECAME FUNCTIONAL. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF SAME DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT COMPLICATION. AFTER THAT, THE FIBER WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE MICROSCOPE INSPECTION FOUND THERE WAS NO LIGHT EXITING THE CONNECTOR FACE WHICH IS INDICATIVE OF AN INTERNAL CONNECTOR FRACTURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25536410 ↗MalfunctionJun 11, 2026Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY PREPARATION, THERE WERE FOUND BLACK SPOTS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF SAME DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT COMPLICATION. AFTER THAT, THE FIBER WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE MICROSCOPE INSPECTION FOUND THAT NO LIGHT WAS EXITING THE CONNECTOR FACE INDICATING AN INTERNAL CONNECTOR FRACTURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25480017 ↗MalfunctionJun 11, 2026Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, THE FIBER WAS FOUND DAMAGED UPON OPENING THE PACKAGE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE IDENTIFIED A CONNECTOR FRACTURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25474193 ↗MalfunctionJun 8, 2026Device Handling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING UNPACKING THERE WAS FOUND THE END FACE OF THE FIBER WAS DAMAGED. THIS EVENT OCCURRED OUTSIDE THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF SAME DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT COMPLICATION. AFTER THAT, THE FIBER WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE INVESTIGATION DETERMINED THAT THE FIBER HAS AN INTERNAL CONNECTION FRACTURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25436587 ↗MalfunctionJun 8, 2026Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FIBERS HAVE BEEN DAMAGING THE DEBRIS SHIELDS, AND ABNORMAL DEGRADATION OF THE DEBRIS SHIELDS HAS BEEN OBSERVED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED FIBER IDENTIFIED THAT THE FIBER TIP WAS BROKEN. THIS REPORT REFERS TO FOURTH FIBER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25426922 ↗MalfunctionJun 3, 2026Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BLACK SPOTS APPEARED ON THE FIBER AFTER A SINGLE USE. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE WAS STABLE. THE ISSUE OCCURRED OUTSIDE THE PATIENT, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER FIBER. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE INDICATED A FIBER CONNECTOR FRACTURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25383142 ↗MalfunctionMay 28, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY (RIRS) AFTER 10 TO 15 SECONDS OF USE, THE FIBER BODY GOT BROKEN FROM THE CONNECTING END WHILE DOING THE PROCEDURE. NO FIBER FRAGMENTS FALL INSIDE THE PATIENT. ANOTHER FIBER WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT COMPLICATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25319680 ↗MalfunctionMay 25, 2026Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A URINARY LITHOTRIPSY PROCEDURE TO TREATED URINARY STONES, BLACK SPOTS APPEARED AFTER THE FIRST FEW USES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THIS DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT COMPLICATION. AFTER THAT, THE FIBER WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE VISUAL INSPECTION FOUND THAT THE FIBER HAD A BODY BREAK.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25273134 ↗MalfunctionMay 22, 2026Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, THE LASER BEAM DID NOT COME OUT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE WITHOUT PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED FIBER IDENTIFIED AN INTERNAL CONNECTOR FRACTURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25260072 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2026Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BLACK SPOTS WERE FOUND ON THE FIBER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THIS DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE IDENTIFIED AN INTERNAL CONNECTOR FRACTURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25234101 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2026Failure to Fire
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE AIMING BEAM WAS NOT COMING OUT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED FIBER IDENTIFIED THAT THERE WAS DISTORTED LIGHT EXITING THE CONNECTOR, INDICATING AN INTERNAL FRACTURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25233438 ↗MalfunctionMay 19, 2026Failure to Fire
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY PROCEDURE FOR KIDNEY STONE, WHEN THE FIBER WAS UNPACKED FOR THE FIRST USE, IT HAD NO AIMING BEAM, THE FIBER COULD NOT OUTPUT ENERGY NORMALLY WHEN STEPPING ON THE LASER PEDAL, AND THE SPARE FIBER WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT COMPLICATION. AFTER THAT, THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE INVESTIGATION DETERMINED THAT THE OBSERVED CONDITION OF NO LIGHT EXITING THE CONNECTOR CAN BE A RESULT OF AN INTERNAL CONNECTOR FRACTURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25219621 ↗
Other Powered Laser Surgical Instrument devices
- Moxy 0010-2400Boston Scientific Corporation · Powered Laser Surgical Instrument4,572 reports
- SOLTIVE TFL-PLSGyrus ACMI, LLC · Powered laser surgical instrument6 recalls450 reports
- Flexiva TracTip M0068403960Boston Scientific Corporation · Powered laser surgical instrument562 reports
- Moses™ AC-10030100Lumenis Ltd. · Powered Laser Surgical Instrument532 reports
- Flexiva M0068403910Boston Scientific Corporation · Powered laser surgical instrument376 reports
- Visualase 9735542Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · Powered laser surgical instrument1 recall2 deaths311 reports
- SOLTIVE TFL-SLSGyrus ACMI, LLC · Powered laser surgical instrument6 recalls33 reports
- NeuroBlate® System 20980Monteris Medical Inc · Powered laser surgical instrument7 deaths296 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page