SlimLine™ Slimline™ EZ SIS 365Recalls & reported problems
Lumenis Ltd. · Class 2
All models of SlimLine (8)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07290109147031), received between Jul 31, 2023 and Aug 22, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break6
- Defective Device2
- Device Displays Incorrect Message1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
- Burn(s)2
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 22, 2025Defective Device; Device Displays Incorrect Message; Defective Device; Device Displays Incorrect Message
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A RETROGRADE INTRARENAL URETEROSCOPY SURGERY (RIRS), THE FIRST TWO FIBERS USED DID NOT WORK PROPERLY. THE ERROR CODE 66 WAS FOUND WITH ONE OF THE TWO DEFECTED FIBERS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD FIBER WITHOUT PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE IDENTIFIED A FIBER BODY FRACTURE. THIS COMPLAINT IS FOR THE SECOND DEFECTIVE FIBER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22873978 ↗MalfunctionAug 22, 2025Defective Device; Defective Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY (RIRS) PROCEDURE, THE FIRST TWO FIBERS USED DID NOT WORK PROPERLY. THE ERROR CODE 66 WAS FOUND WITH ONE OF THE TWO DEFECTED FIBERS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD FIBER WITHOUT PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE IDENTIFIED A FIBER TIP FRACTURE. THIS COMPLAINT IS FOR THE FIRST DEFECTIVE FIBER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22873975 ↗MalfunctionNov 27, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TRANS URETERAL LITHOTRIPSY PROCEDURE, THE FIBER BROKE AND GOT DAMAGED ON THE INTERNAL DISTAL SIDE. DUE TO THIS, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20800366 ↗MalfunctionJun 26, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING THE PROCEDURE TO TREAT URETERIC STONES, THE FIBER BODY BROKE OFF IN CATHETER WHILE IT WAS INSIDE THE PATIENT, AFTER LASERING FOR ABOUT 5 TO 10 MINUTES. A SEMIRIGID SCOPE WAS BEING USED AT THE TIME. THE PHYSICIAN DOES NOT RECALL ANY KINKS OR BENDS IN THE FIBER. ALL FIBER FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT USING BASKET RETRIEVAL. THE FIBER WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING THE SECOND FIBER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19616040 ↗InjuryOct 13, 2023Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LASER LITHOTRIPSY PROCEDURE FOR RENAL SYSTEM STONES, THE FIBER BROKE IN THE SURGEON HAND DURING USE AND BURNT HIS FINGER. FIRST AID WAS APPLIED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETE WITH ANOTHER FIBER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: Burn(s)
MAUDE report 17932525 ↗InjuryOct 10, 2023Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, THE FIBER BROKE IN THE SURGEON'S HAND DURING USE AND BURNT HIS FINGER, THE SURGEON WAS ATTENDED WITH FIRST AID. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE WITHOUT PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: Burn(s)
MAUDE report 17909619 ↗MalfunctionAug 30, 2023Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A URETER STONE PROCEDURE, THE FIBER BROKE INTO TWO PIECES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17653509 ↗MalfunctionJul 31, 2023Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN URETEROSCOPY PROCEDURE FOR STONES IN URETER, AT THE FIRST TIME THE FIBER FIRED THE LASER, THE FIBER BROKE. THE PROCEDURE COULD BE COMPLETED USING ANOTHER FIBER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17431487 ↗
Other Powered Laser Surgical Instrument devices
- Moxy 0010-2400Boston Scientific Corporation · Powered Laser Surgical Instrument4,572 reports
- SOLTIVE TFL-PLSGyrus ACMI, LLC · Powered laser surgical instrument6 recalls450 reports
- Flexiva TracTip M0068403960Boston Scientific Corporation · Powered laser surgical instrument562 reports
- Moses™ AC-10030100Lumenis Ltd. · Powered Laser Surgical Instrument532 reports
- Flexiva M0068403910Boston Scientific Corporation · Powered laser surgical instrument376 reports
- Visualase 9735542Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · Powered laser surgical instrument1 recall2 deaths311 reports
- SOLTIVE TFL-SLSGyrus ACMI, LLC · Powered laser surgical instrument6 recalls33 reports
- NeuroBlate® System 20980Monteris Medical Inc · Powered laser surgical instrument7 deaths296 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page