Skip to content

SlimLine™ Slimline™ EZ SIS 365Recalls & reported problems

Lumenis Ltd. · Class 2

All models of SlimLine (8)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07290109147031), received between Jul 31, 2023 and Aug 22, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 2 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break6
  • Defective Device2
  • Device Displays Incorrect Message1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
  • Burn(s)2

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 22, 2025Defective Device; Device Displays Incorrect Message; Defective Device; Device Displays Incorrect Message

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A RETROGRADE INTRARENAL URETEROSCOPY SURGERY (RIRS), THE FIRST TWO FIBERS USED DID NOT WORK PROPERLY. THE ERROR CODE 66 WAS FOUND WITH ONE OF THE TWO DEFECTED FIBERS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD FIBER WITHOUT PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE IDENTIFIED A FIBER BODY FRACTURE. THIS COMPLAINT IS FOR THE SECOND DEFECTIVE FIBER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22873978 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 22, 2025Defective Device; Defective Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY (RIRS) PROCEDURE, THE FIRST TWO FIBERS USED DID NOT WORK PROPERLY. THE ERROR CODE 66 WAS FOUND WITH ONE OF THE TWO DEFECTED FIBERS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD FIBER WITHOUT PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE IDENTIFIED A FIBER TIP FRACTURE. THIS COMPLAINT IS FOR THE FIRST DEFECTIVE FIBER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22873975 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 27, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TRANS URETERAL LITHOTRIPSY PROCEDURE, THE FIBER BROKE AND GOT DAMAGED ON THE INTERNAL DISTAL SIDE. DUE TO THIS, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20800366 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 26, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING THE PROCEDURE TO TREAT URETERIC STONES, THE FIBER BODY BROKE OFF IN CATHETER WHILE IT WAS INSIDE THE PATIENT, AFTER LASERING FOR ABOUT 5 TO 10 MINUTES. A SEMIRIGID SCOPE WAS BEING USED AT THE TIME. THE PHYSICIAN DOES NOT RECALL ANY KINKS OR BENDS IN THE FIBER. ALL FIBER FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT USING BASKET RETRIEVAL. THE FIBER WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING THE SECOND FIBER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19616040 ↗
  • InjuryOct 13, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LASER LITHOTRIPSY PROCEDURE FOR RENAL SYSTEM STONES, THE FIBER BROKE IN THE SURGEON HAND DURING USE AND BURNT HIS FINGER. FIRST AID WAS APPLIED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETE WITH ANOTHER FIBER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Burn(s)

    MAUDE report 17932525 ↗
  • InjuryOct 10, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, THE FIBER BROKE IN THE SURGEON'S HAND DURING USE AND BURNT HIS FINGER, THE SURGEON WAS ATTENDED WITH FIRST AID. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE WITHOUT PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Burn(s)

    MAUDE report 17909619 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 30, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A URETER STONE PROCEDURE, THE FIBER BROKE INTO TWO PIECES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17653509 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 31, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN URETEROSCOPY PROCEDURE FOR STONES IN URETER, AT THE FIRST TIME THE FIBER FIRED THE LASER, THE FIBER BROKE. THE PROCEDURE COULD BE COMPLETED USING ANOTHER FIBER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17431487 ↗

Other Powered Laser Surgical Instrument devices

All Powered Laser Surgical Instrument devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page