Tuff UniCon Implant NMCF3516Recalls & reported problems
Noris Medical Ltd · Tuff UniCon D3.5 L16 Conical Platform Ti. Implant · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Tuff UniCon Implant (18)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07290116154442), received between May 26, 2026 and May 27, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
Patient problems
- Unspecified Infection2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 27, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOOSENING OF IMPLANT NOT RELATED TO BONE INGROWTH WAS VERIFIED. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT IS A HEALTHY. OBSERVED DURING THE EVENT: INFECTION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 25300515 ↗InjuryMay 26, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2026. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOOSENING OF IMPLANT NOT RELATED TO BONE INGROWTH WAS VERIFIED. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT IS HEALTHY. OBSERVED DURING THE EVENT: INFECTION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 25280015 ↗
Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page