Skip to content

Tuff UniCon Implant NMCF5008Recalls & reported problems

Noris Medical Ltd · Tuff UniCon D5 L8 Conical Platform Ti. Implant · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Tuff UniCon Implant (18)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07290116154671), received between Dec 29, 2025 and Apr 28, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 2 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 2 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth4
  • Loss of Osseointegration2

Patient problems

  • Implant Pain4
  • Unspecified Infection4
  • Failure of Implant2
  • Osteolysis2

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 28, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS REPORTED. AT THE EVENT, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. OBSERVED DURING THE EVENT: BONE LOSS. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 25016891 ↗
  • InjuryApr 28, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS REPORTED. AT THE EVENT, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. OBSERVED DURING THE EVENT: BONE LOSS. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 25015515 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOOSENING OF IMPLANT NOT RELATED TO BONE INGROWTH WAS VERIFIED. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT IS HEALTHY. OBSERVED DURING THE EVENT: INFECTION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24723986 ↗
  • InjuryMar 25, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOOSENING OF IMPLANT NOT RELATED TO BONE INGROWTH WAS VERIFIED. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT IS HEALTHY. OBSERVED DURING THE EVENT: INFECTION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24687577 ↗
  • InjuryDec 31, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOOSENING OF IMPLANT NOT RELATED TO BONE INGROWTH WAS VERIFIED. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT HAS CANCER BRAIN. AT THE EVENT, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. OBSERVED DURING THE EVENT: INFECTION/MOBILITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Implant Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23934574 ↗
  • InjuryDec 29, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 . ON (B)(6) 2025 , LOOSENING OF IMPLANT NOT RELATED TO BONE INGROWTH WAS VERIFIED. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION, THE PATIENT HAS CANCER BRAIN. AT THE EVENT, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. OBSERVED DURING THE EVENT: INFECTION/MOBILITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Implant Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23906824 ↗

Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices

All Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page