Brånemark System® 28897Recalls & reported problems
Nobel Biocare AB · Brånemark System Mk III WP 5.0x7mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Brånemark System (141)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07332747004816), received between Jun 24, 2022 and Aug 1, 2025 — classified as 6 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loss of Osseointegration6
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant4
- Pain2
- Unspecified Infection2
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 1, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
InjuryAug 1, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
InjuryJun 21, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO A LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 17173653 ↗InjuryJun 21, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO A LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 17173644 ↗InjuryJun 24, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO A LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 14806117 ↗InjuryJun 24, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO A LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 14806079 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page