Skip to content

Xpert MRSA NxG GXMRSA-NXG-10Recalls & reported problems

Cepheid · Xpert MRSA NxG kit; 10 test kit · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07332940001711), received between Mar 13, 2025 and Mar 13, 2025 — classified as 1 death.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “False Negative Result” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • False Negative Result1

Patient problems

  • Cardiac Arrest1
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • DeathMar 13, 2025False Negative Result; False Negative Result

    US CUSTOMER CONTACTED CEPHEID TO DISCUSS DISCREPANT RESULTS FOR ONE PATIENT USING MRSA NXG FOR THE MRSA ANALYTE. ON (B)(6) 2025, PATIENT WAS ADMITTED IN A STATE OF SHOCK. ON THE SAME DAY, A NASAL SWAB (SAMPLE 1) WAS COLLECTED ON LABEL USING THE COPAN ESWAB COLLECTION DEVICE AND PROCESSED PER THE IFU. SAMPLE WAS RUN ON (B)(6) 2025 ON XPERT MRSA NXG RESULTED IN MRSA NOT DETECTED. THIS RESULT WAS REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN. A SEPARATE BLOOD CULTURE SAMPLE (SAMPLE 2) WAS COLLECTED FROM THE PATIENT ON (B)(6) 2025. THE DIRECT BLOOD SAMPLE WAS PLATED AND THE ISOLATE GROWN WAS IDENTIFIED AS MRSA. THIS RESULT PROMPTED THE CUSTOMER TO PLATE THE NASAL ESWAB SAMPLE 1 ON BAP, CHOC, AND MACCONKEY PLATES. AN ORGANISM GREW AND WAS ISOLATED AND IT WAS IDENTIFIED AS MRSA BY VITEK 2 SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING, WHICH SHOWED AMOXICILLIN, AMPICILLIN, OXACILLIN, CEFAZOLIN, CIPROFLOXACIN, AND LEVOFLOXACIN RESISTANCE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED PBP2A TESTING WAS ALSO PERFORMED ON SPECIMEN WHICH RESULTED AS POSITIVE. DATE OF RESULTS UNKNOWN. ON (B)(6) 2025, SAMPLE 2 WAS RAN ON BIOFIRE BCID WHICH RESULTED IN S. AUREUS, NEGATIVE FOR MRSA. THE PATIENT RECEIVED A SINGLE DOSE OF VANCOMYCIN ON (B)(6) 2025. IT WAS STOPPED A

    Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21599431 ↗

Other System, Nucleic Acid Amplification Test, Dna, Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, Direct Specimen devices

All System, Nucleic Acid Amplification Test, Dna, Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, Direct Specimen devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page