Skip to content

Navina™ Rectal Catheter Set Regular 68940Recalls & reported problems

Wellspect AB · Navina Transanal Irrigation. Rectal Catheter set regular. 10 Rectal catheters regular. Single use. Non sterile Device. Rx Only. · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07333387024745), received between Mar 18, 2026 and Apr 29, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • Pain2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 29, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT USING THE NAVINA CLASSIC TRANSANAL IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH NAVINA REGULAR RECTAL BALLOON CATHETERS REPORTED REPEATED BALLOON RUPTURES DURING USE. THE PATIENT INDICATED THAT DURING A SINGLE DAY OF USE, APPROXIMATELY SIX CATHETERS EXPERIENCED BALLOON RUPTURE WHILE IN SITU. OVER THE SUBSEQUENT SIX DAYS, THE PATIENT REQUIRED THE USE OF APPROXIMATELY TWO CATHETERS PER DAY DUE TO SIMILAR FAILURES. THE REPORTED BALLOON RUPTURES OCCURRED EITHER IMMEDIATELY DURING BALLOON INFLATION OR WITHIN 1-2 MINUTES FOLLOWING INFLATION DURING THE IRRIGATION PHASE. THE PATIENT STATED THAT THE DEVICE WAS USED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE, WITH NO PERCEIVED RESISTANCE DURING INSERTION AND CONFIRMATION THAT THE BALLOON WAS FULLY POSITIONED WITHIN THE RECTUM PRIOR TO INFLATION. THE PATIENT REPORTED PERFORMING APPROXIMATELY 5-6 PUMP STROKES FOR BALLOON INFLATION, FOLLOWED BY IRRIGATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 7-8 MINUTES. THE PATIENT REPORTED ASSOCIATED SYMPTOMS INCLUDING MILD RECTAL BLEEDING (DESCRIBED AS A FEW DROPS OBSERVED IN THE TOILET) OCCURRING IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING AT LEAST ONE BALLOON RUPTURE, AS WELL AS RECTAL DISCOMFORT AND PAIN PERSISTING OVER A PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY 4-5 DAYS. THE PA

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 25027438 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 18, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    YOUNG FEMALE PATIENT, WHO HAS A HISTORY OF SPINA BIFIDA, WAS USING THE MANUAL NAVINA CLASSIC SYSTEM WITH RECTAL BALLOON CATHETER AT HOME UNDER THE CARE OF HER MOTHER (CAREGIVER). ACCORDING TO THE CAREGIVER, THE RECTAL BALLOON RUPTURED TWICE ON THE SAME DAY WHILE INFLATING WITH APPROXIMATELY 3-4 PUMPS OF AIR. THE CAREGIVER REPORTS THAT THE RECTAL CATHETER WAS LUBRICATED APPROPRIATELY AND INSERTED TO THE CORRECT DEPTH. SHE STATED THAT SIMILAR BALLOON FAILURES HAVE OCCURRED IN THE PAST. THE CAREGIVER ALSO REPORTED A SEPARATE EVENT INVOLVING THE PATIENT'S FOLEY CATHETER. AFTER TRANSFERRING FROM THE TOILET BACK TO THE BED, THE CAREGIVER FOUND THAT THE FOLEY CATHETER HAD BEEN UNINTENTIONALLY EXPELLED WITH THE BALLOON STILL INTACT. THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, WHERE THE FOLEY WAS REINSERTED. THE CAREGIVER QUESTIONED WHETHER THIS EXPULSION COULD BE RELATED TO THE USE OF THE NAVINA SYSTEM. IT WAS EXPLAINED TO HER THAT THIS IS UNLIKELY, AS REMOVAL OF AN INTACT FOLEY BALLOON TYPICALLY REQUIRES CONSIDERABLE TRACTION AND MAY HAVE OCCURRED DURING PATIENT TRANSFER. THE PATIENT HAS EXPERIENCED SOME VAGINAL DISCOMFORT AND BACK PAIN. BACK PAIN IS COMMON FOR HER DUE TO UNDERLYIN

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 24625993 ↗

Other Tubes, gastrointestinal (and accessories) devices

All Tubes, gastrointestinal (and accessories) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page