Skip to content

Motiva® SmoothSilk® Round Ergonomix Breast Implant ERSM-310QRecalls & reported problems

Establishment Labs S.A. · Motiva® SmoothSilk® Round Ergonomix Breast Implant Round Ergonomix Breast Implant - Mini with Qid 310 cc · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Motiva SmoothSilk Round Ergonomix Breast Implant (69)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07445161012005), received between Oct 21, 2024 and Jul 30, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 2 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection4

Patient problems

  • Capsular Contracture4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 30, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AUSTRALIA. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WHO HAD BREAST AUGMENTATION WITH IMPLANTS IN (B)(6) 2024 WAS DIAGNOSED WITH A BAKER III CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE IN HER RIGHT BREAST (SN (B)(6)). NO PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS, SUCH AS WEIGHT, OR ETHNICITY, WERE PROVIDED BY THE REPORTER. EFFORTS TO GATHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE ONGOING, AND THE INVESTIGATION REMAINS IN PROGRESS.

    Patient problems: Capsular Contracture

    MAUDE report 22667212 ↗
  • InjuryDec 3, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    A PATIENT PRESENTED CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE BAKER GRADE IV IN BOTH BREASTS. NO PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS, WEIGHT, OR ETHNICITY, WERE PROVIDED BY THE REPORTER, AND NO ADVERSE OUTCOMES FOR THE PATIENT HAVE BEEN NOTED. EFFORTS TO GATHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE ONGOING, AND THE INVESTIGATION REMAINS IN PROGRESS.

    Patient problems: Capsular Contracture

    MAUDE report 20836385 ↗
  • InjuryOct 28, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE CLASSIFIED AS BAKER GRADE III. RIGHT SIDE.

    Patient problems: Capsular Contracture

    MAUDE report 20550278 ↗
  • InjuryOct 21, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT TOTAL MASTECTOMY AND PRIMARY REVISION SURGERY. ONE YEAR LATER, UPON EXAMINATION, THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH BAKER GRADE III CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE. LEFT SIDE.

    Patient problems: Capsular Contracture

    MAUDE report 20499787 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Breast, Noninflatable, Internal, Silicone Gel-Filled devices

All Prosthesis, Breast, Noninflatable, Internal, Silicone Gel-Filled devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page