Skip to content

Motiva® SmoothSilk® Round Ergonomix Breast Implant ERSD-300QRecalls & reported problems

Establishment Labs S.A. · Motiva® SmoothSilk® Round Ergonomix Breast Implant Round Ergonomix Breast Implant - Demi with Qid 300 cc · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Motiva SmoothSilk Round Ergonomix Breast Implant (69)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
11
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
11
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07445161012166), received between Jan 9, 2025 and May 19, 2026 — classified as 11 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (7 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 2 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 2 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 3 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection7
  • Break3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Capsular Contracture7
  • Insufficient Information3
  • Unspecified Infection2

Recent adverse event reports

The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 19, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    LOCATION: (B)(6). ALLEGEDLY, A PATIENT REQUIRED A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO A BAKER GRADE III/IV CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE IN HER RIGHT BREAST. THE INVESTIGATION WAS COMPLETED.

    Patient problems: Capsular Contracture

    MAUDE report 25219455 ↗
  • InjuryMar 20, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    MÉXICO. ALLEGEDLY, A PATIENT IMPLANTED IN (B)(6) 2026 PRESENTED AN INFECTION ON THE LEFT SIDE, AND THE IMPLANT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY REMOVED. THE INVESTIGATION REMAINS IN PROGRESS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24651123 ↗
  • InjuryMar 18, 2026Break

    BELARUS. ALLEGEDLY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT THE INITIAL BREAST IMPLANT SURGERY IN (B)(6) 2020. IN (B)(6) 2026, AN ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION DETECTED A RUPTURE OF THE LEFT IMPLANT, AND DURING SURGERY, THE RUPTURE OF BOTH IMPLANTS WAS CONFIRMED. IN (B)(6) 2026, BOTH IMPLANTS WERE REPLACED WITH MOTIVA IMPLANTS (SN: (B)(6)).

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24630070 ↗
  • InjuryMar 18, 2026Break

    (B)(6). ALLEGEDLY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT THE INITIAL BREAST IMPLANT SURGERY IN (B)(6) 2020. IN (B)(6) 2026, AN ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION DETECTED A RUPTURE OF THE LEFT IMPLANT, AND DURING SURGERY, THE RUPTURE OF BOTH IMPLANTS WAS CONFIRMED. IN (B)(6) 2026, BOTH IMPLANTS WERE REPLACED WITH MOTIVA IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24627499 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 9, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AUSTRALIA. ALLEGEDLY, A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT AN AUGMENTATION MAMMOPLASTY IN JULY 2025 REQUIRED A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO A BAKER GRADE III CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE AND IMPLANT DISPLACEMENT IN HER LEFT BREAST. NO PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS, SUCH AS WEIGHT, OR ETHNICITY, WERE PROVIDED BY THE REPORTER. EFFORTS TO GATHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE ONGOING, AND THE INVESTIGATION REMAINS IN PROGRESS.

    Patient problems: Capsular Contracture

    MAUDE report 24292728 ↗
  • InjuryDec 29, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    TAIWAN. ALLEGEDLY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT BILATERAL BREAST AUGMENTATION SURGERY IN (B)(6) 2024. POSTOPERATIVELY, SHE NOTICED AN ELEVATION DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BREASTS. DESPITE PERFORMING REGULAR MASSAGE AS INSTRUCTED, THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH BAKER¿S GRADE IV CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE (SN: (B)(6). NO PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS, SUCH AS WEIGHT, OR ETHNICITY, WERE PROVIDED BY THE REPORTER. EFFORTS TO GATHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE ONGOING, AND THE INVESTIGATION REMAINS IN PROGRESS.

    Patient problems: Capsular Contracture

    MAUDE report 23914444 ↗
  • InjuryDec 9, 2025Break; Break

    AUSTRALIA. ALLEGEDLY, A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A BREAST AUGMENTATION IN (B)(6) 2025 WAS DIAGNOSED WITH A DEVICE RUPTURE IN THE RIGHT BREAST AFTER EXPERIENCING REDNESS AND PAIN. AN ULTRASOUND CONFIRMED THE RUPTURE, AND A PATHOLOGY STUDY REVEALED AN INFECTION. A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED. NO PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS, SUCH AS WEIGHT, OR ETHNICITY, WERE PROVIDED BY THE REPORTER. EFFORTS TO GATHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE ONGOING, AND THE INVESTIGATION REMAINS IN PROGRESS.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23761964 ↗
  • InjuryJul 2, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    CHINA. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT AUGMENTATION SURGERY IN (B)(6) 2024 DEVELOPED PAIN AND PROGRESSIVE HARDENING IN BOTH BREASTS. AFTER BEING DIAGNOSED WITH A BAKER GRADE III CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE HAD A REMOVAL SURGERY IN (B)(6) 2025. NO PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS, SUCH AS WEIGHT, OR ETHNICITY, WERE PROVIDED BY THE REPORTER. EFFORTS TO GATHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE ONGOING, AND THE INVESTIGATION REMAINS IN PROGRESS.

    Patient problems: Capsular Contracture

    MAUDE report 22385421 ↗
  • InjuryJun 10, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    TAIWAN. IT WAS REPORTED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT SURGERY IN (B)(6) 2024. VISITED THE DOCTOR IN (B)(6) 2025 AND WAS DIAGNOSED WITH BAKER GRADE III CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE IN BOTH BREASTS (SN: (B)(6)). NO PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS, SUCH AS WEIGHT, OR ETHNICITY, WERE PROVIDED BY THE REPORTER. EFFORTS TO GATHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE ONGOING, AND THE INVESTIGATION REMAINS IN PROGRESS.

    Patient problems: Capsular Contracture

    MAUDE report 22179545 ↗
  • InjuryJun 10, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    TAIWAN. IT WAS REPORTED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT SURGERY IN (B)(6) 2024. VISITED THE DOCTOR IN (B)(6) 2025 AND WAS DIAGNOSED WITH BAKER GRADE III CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE IN BOTH BREASTS (SN: (B)(6)). NO PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS, SUCH AS WEIGHT, OR ETHNICITY, WERE PROVIDED BY THE REPORTER. EFFORTS TO GATHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE ONGOING, AND THE INVESTIGATION REMAINS IN PROGRESS.

    Patient problems: Capsular Contracture

    MAUDE report 22179536 ↗
  • InjuryJan 9, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A UNILATERAL REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO A CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE BAKER GRADE III. THE EXACT OCCURRENCE DATE WAS NOT PROVIDED. FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Capsular Contracture

    MAUDE report 21118714 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Breast, Noninflatable, Internal, Silicone Gel-Filled devices

All Prosthesis, Breast, Noninflatable, Internal, Silicone Gel-Filled devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page