Skip to content

Motiva® SmoothSilk® Round Ergonomix Breast Implant ERSF-375QRecalls & reported problems

Establishment Labs S.A. · Motiva® SmoothSilk® Round Ergonomix Breast Implant Round Ergonomix Breast Implant - Full with Qid 375 cc · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Motiva SmoothSilk Round Ergonomix Breast Implant (69)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07445161012371), received between Jan 3, 2025 and Oct 15, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 2 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection2
  • Patient-Device Incompatibility2

Patient problems

  • Bacterial Infection2
  • Capsular Contracture2
  • Post Operative Wound Infection2
  • Seroma2
  • Wound Dehiscence2
  • Breast Discomfort/Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 15, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    ARGENTINA. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT PRESENTED INCREASED PERICAPSULAR PAIN IN THE RIGHT BREAST, CONSISTENT WITH CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE BAKER GRADE III (SN: (B)(6)). NO PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS, SUCH AS WEIGHT, OR ETHNICITY, WERE PROVIDED BY THE REPORTER. EFFORTS TO GATHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE ONGOING, AND THE INVESTIGATION REMAINS IN PROGRESS.

    Patient problems: Breast Discomfort/Pain; Capsular Contracture

    MAUDE report 23301914 ↗
  • InjurySep 8, 2025Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    MEXICO. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 53-YEAR-OLD FEMALE PATIENT DEVELOPED BILATERAL WOUND DEHISCENCE WITH IMPLANT EXPOSURE AND LIQUID DISCHARGE FOLLOWING AUGMENTATION AND MASTOPEXY ON (B)(6) 2025. CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT FAILED, AND BOTH IMPLANTS WERE EXPLANTED ON POSTOPERATIVE DAY 21. CULTURE WAS POSITIVE FOR STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS. THE PATIENT EVOLVED FAVORABLY AFTER EXPLANTATION AND ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT.

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection; Post Operative Wound Infection; Seroma; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 22994772 ↗
  • InjurySep 8, 2025Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    MEXICO. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 53-YEAR-OLD FEMALE PATIENT DEVELOPED BILATERAL WOUND DEHISCENCE WITH IMPLANT EXPOSURE AND LIQUID DISCHARGE FOLLOWING AUGMENTATION AND MASTOPEXY ON (B)(6) 2025. CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT FAILED, AND BOTH IMPLANTS WERE EXPLANTED ON POSTOPERATIVE DAY 21. CULTURE WAS POSITIVE FOR STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS. THE PATIENT EVOLVED FAVORABLY AFTER EXPLANTATION AND ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT.

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection; Post Operative Wound Infection; Seroma; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 22994771 ↗
  • InjuryJan 3, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    A PATIENT REPORTED EXPERIENCING CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE BAKER GRADE III ON HER LEFT BREAST. SHE WAS ADVISED TO UNDERWENT EXPLANTATION SURGERY. NO PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS, WEIGHT, OR ETHNICITY, WERE PROVIDED BY THE REPORTER, AND NO ADVERSE OUTCOMES FOR THE PATIENT HAVE BEEN NOTED. EFFORTS TO GATHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE ONGOING, AND THE INVESTIGATION REMAINS IN PROGRESS.

    Patient problems: Capsular Contracture

    MAUDE report 21072186 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Breast, Noninflatable, Internal, Silicone Gel-Filled devices

All Prosthesis, Breast, Noninflatable, Internal, Silicone Gel-Filled devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page