Skip to content

Alcon Grieshaber Finesse MAXGrip REVOLUTION 705.13Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · GRIESHABER MAXGrip® REV DSP Forceps, 25G · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07612717070714), received between Sep 13, 2021 and Apr 2, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation Problem1
  • Break1
  • Difficult to Open or Close1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Retinal Detachment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 2, 2026Activation Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE OPHTHALMIC FORCEPS WAS OPENING AND CLOSING POORLY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY USING AN ALTERNATIVE FORCEPS, AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24765568 ↗
  • InjuryApr 1, 2022Break; Break

    IN A LITERATURE REPORT, PHYSICIANS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF AN OPHTHALMIC FORCEPS BROKE DURING A SURGERY. A NEW FORCEPS WERE USED TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. ONE MONTH AFTER THE SURGERY, THE PATIENT REPORTED "ONE LARGE FLOATER" IN EYE. A METALLIC OBJECT WAS NOTED INFERIORLY ALONG WITH A SUPEROTEMPORAL RETINAL DETACHMENT. THE METALLIC OBJECT WAS IDENTIFIED AS THE MISSING FORCEPS TIP AND WAS REMOVED THROUGH AN ENLARGED SCLEROTOMY. THE RETINAL DETACHMENT WAS REPAIRED.

    Patient problems: Retinal Detachment

    MAUDE report 13978819 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 13, 2021Difficult to Open or Close; Difficult to Open or Close

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THE TIP OF THE FORCEPS DID NOT OPEN VERY MUCH DURING A COMBINATION CATARACT AND VITRECTOMY SURGERY. AN ALTERNATE FORCEPS WAS OBTAINED IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12460882 ↗

Other Forceps, ophthalmic devices

All Forceps, ophthalmic devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page