Skip to content

FINESSE REFLEX 811.13Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · 27+™ GRIESHABER MAXGrip™ Forceps REFLEX DSP · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07612717071575), received between Apr 2, 2024 and Feb 12, 2026 — classified as 9 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 2 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break6
  • Difficult to Open or Close3

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
  • Insufficient Information3

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 12, 2026Break

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT, DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION AN OPHTHALMIC FORCEPS FOUND BROKEN. IT IS UNKNOWN WHETHER THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. DETAILS REGARDING PATIENT HARM WAS NOT REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT. THIS FILE PERTAINS FIRST OF THE TWO FORCEPS REPORTED FROM THE SAME FACILITY ON THE SAME EVENT DATE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24320538 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 12, 2026Break

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT, DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION AN OPHTHALMIC FORCEPS FOUND BROKEN. IT IS UNKNOWN WHETHER THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. DETAILS REGARDING PATIENT HARM WAS NOT REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT. THIS FILE PERTAINS SECOND OF THE TWO FORCEPS REPORTED FROM THE SAME FACILITY ON THE SAME EVENT DATE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24320536 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 18, 2025Break; Break

    A CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT AN OPHTHALMIC FORCEPS WAS BROKEN DURING THE SURGERY SURGEON NOTICED THE FORCEPS BROKEN AFTER BEING PUT BACK THROUGH THE TROCAR AND FOREIGN BODY WAS REMOVED. SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23578138 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 2, 2025Break; Break

    A CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGERY THE TIP OF AN OPHTHALMIC FORCEPS BROKE OFF. PROCEDURE DETAILS WERE NOT REPORTED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21950627 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 28, 2025Break; Break

    A CUSTOMER REPORTED OPHTHALMIC FORCEPS BROKEN DURING SURGERY WHILE BEING USED ANTERIORLY; THE BROKEN PIECE OF FORCEPS WAS FOUND IN THE EYE, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY WITH THE OTHER FORCEPS. AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21716466 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 17, 2025Break; Break

    A CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT AN OPHTHALMIC FORCEPS TIP BROKE OFF ON THE PATIENT'S EYE DURING VITRECTOMY SURGERY . THE TIP WAS REMOVED FROM THE EYE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21176785 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2024Difficult to Open or Close; Difficult to Open or Close

    A CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT OPHTHALMIC FORCEPS WERE POORLY ENGAGED DURING THE VITRECTOMY SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY AFTER REPLACING THE PRODUCT. THEE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19709225 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 7, 2024Difficult to Open or Close; Difficult to Open or Close

    A CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT DURING VITRECTOMY AND CATARACT COMBINATION SURGERY, AN OPHTHALMIC FORCEPS DID NOT OPEN WELL. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED AFTER REPLACING THE PRODUCT WITH ANOTHER ONE. THERE'S NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19260861 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 2, 2024Difficult to Open or Close; Difficult to Open or Close

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT DURING VITRECTOMY SURGERY, AN OPHTHALMIC FORCEPS TIP UNABLE TO OPEN AND CLOSE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING NEW DEVICE. THERE'S NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19021251 ↗

Other Forceps, ophthalmic devices

All Forceps, ophthalmic devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page