Skip to content

Trident 502-01-50DRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Hemispherical Acetabular Shell · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Trident (160)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613153073079), received between May 28, 2019 and Apr 5, 2022 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration2
  • Injury2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 5, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    PATIENT HAD A CONSTRAINED LINER IMPLANTED TO ADDRESS RECURRING DISLOCATIONS. THE LINER DETACHED FROM THE ACETABULAR SHELL. THE CUP WAS REMOVED AND A MULTIHOLE CUP WAS IMPLANTED IN A DIFFERENT POSITION AND A MDM CONSTRUCT WAS DEEMED STABLE.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties

    MAUDE report 14018056 ↗
  • InjuryMar 31, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    ASEPTIC LOOSENING TRIDENT ACETABULAR COMPONENT. PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION OF ACETABULAR COMP.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury

    MAUDE report 9903681 ↗
  • InjuryMay 28, 2019Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    THE FOLLOWING REVISION EVENT WAS INCLUDED IN A REPORT RECEIVED AS PART OF THE (B)(6): PATIENT HAD A RIGHT PRIMARY THA DUE TO AVASCULAR NECROSIS; UNDERWENT REVISION DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE ACETABULAR COMPONENT. THE CUP, LINER AND HEAD WERE EXCHANGED. PATIENT'S BMI IS REPORTED AS 30.1.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury

    MAUDE report 8645732 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page