Trident 502-01-58FRecalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Hemispherical Acetabular Shell · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Trident (160)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613153073116), received between Jun 15, 2018 and Feb 11, 2019 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loss of Osseointegration1
- Osseointegration Problem1
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration2
- Injury2
- Inflammation1
- Pain1
- Reaction1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 11, 2019Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
PATIENT HAD A REVISION HIP A YEAR AGO FOR DISLOCATION AND DEVELOPED PAIN FROM A POSSIBLE LOOSE CUP. REVIEW OF X-RAYS BY A CLINICIAN STATES: 'PROVIDED X-RAY SHOWS LIKELY LOOSE ACETABULAR COMPONENT WITH 2 SCREWS.'
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury; Pain
MAUDE report 8330004 ↗InjuryJun 15, 2018Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO SURGEON'S CONCERN OVER ELEVATED CHROMIUM LEVELS (LEVELS NOT REPORTED), AND RADIOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF SHELL LOOSENING. INTRAOPERATIVELY, CORROSION IN THE HEAD AND ON THE TRUNNION WERE REPORTED. PRIMARY IMPLANT WAS REPORTED AS BEING GREATER THAN 10 YEARS PRIOR TO (B)(6) 2018. PATIENT WAS REVISED TO RESTORATION MODULAR COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Inflammation; Injury; Reaction
MAUDE report 7604968 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page