Skip to content

Restoration 6276-7-317Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Modular Hip System · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Restoration (86)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07613154058938), received between Jun 6, 2018 and Jun 6, 2018 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 6, 2018Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO THE STEM BEING LOOSE. A SIZE 17 STEM WAS REVISED TO A COMPETITOR SIZE 27 STEM. THOUGH THERE WERE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE HEAD OR POLY LINER, THOSE WERE REVISED TO COMPETITOR AND STRYKER DEVICES. THE SHELL AND METAL LINER WERE NOT REVISED. PATIENT'S PREVIOUS SURGERY WAS A REVISION FROM COMPETITOR PRODUCT TO STRYKER DEVICES.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury

    MAUDE report 7575401 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page