Citation 6265-5216Recalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 132 Degree Neck Angle V40 Hip Stem - Right · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Citation (20)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07613154316090), received between Nov 13, 2018 and Nov 13, 2018 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
- Injury1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 13, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
SURGEON REPORTS PATIENT FR A STATUS POST RIGHT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT DONE ON (B)(6) 2018 WAS COMPLAINING HER HIP SEEMED TO BE SHORT AND WOULD LIKE TO HAVE IT LENGTHENED. IT WAS UNDETERMINED IF THE STEM SUBSIDED. REGARDLESS THE SURGEON DECIDED TO TRY TO LENGTHEN THE LEG BY GOING TO A LONGER HEAD SIZE. THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED THROUGH THE ANTERIOR APPROACH. THE HEAD WAS REMOVED AND THE STEM WAS DETERMINED TO BE WELL FIXED. A +7.5 36MM HEAD WAS TRIED REPLACING THE ORIGINAL HEAD LENGTH. IT WAS DETERMINED THE LEG LENGTHS WERE NOW EQUAL AND THE NEW HEAD WAS IMPACTED AND THE SURGICAL SITE CLOSED.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Injury
MAUDE report 8064627 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page