Skip to content

AVIATOR 48824012Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · VARIABLE, SELF-DRILLING SCREW · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AVIATOR (36)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252152590), received between Jul 11, 2016 and Apr 17, 2019 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated4
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Component Incompatible1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Device Slipped1

Patient problems

  • Injury4
  • Pain3
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 17, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    ON (B)(6) 2019, THE REFLEX HYBRID SYSTEM WAS IMPLANTED WITH NO KNOWN ISSUE. ON (B)(6) 2019, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT INCOMPATIBLE SCREWS WERE USED WITH THE PLATE, THE SURGEON WAS NOTIFIED. DURING A POST-OPERATIVE X-RAY, THE SURGEON NOTED THAT THE SCREWS AND PLATE WERE BACKING OUT. THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING SOME PAIN AND UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019 TO REPLACE THE PLATE AND SCREWS.

    Patient problems: Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 8522916 ↗
  • InjuryApr 17, 2019Component Incompatible; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    ON (B)(6) 2019, THE REFLEX HYBRID SYSTEM WAS IMPLANTED WITH NO KNOWN ISSUE. ON (B)(6) 2019, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT INCOMPATIBLE SCREWS WERE USED WITH THE PLATE, THE SURGEON WAS NOTIFIED. DURING A POST-OPERATIVE X-RAY, THE SURGEON NOTED THAT THE SCREWS AND PLATE WERE BACKING OUT. THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING SOME PAIN AND UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019 TO REPLACE THE PLATE AND SCREWS.

    Patient problems: Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 8522914 ↗
  • InjuryApr 17, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    ON (B)(6) 2019, THE REFLEX HYBRID SYSTEM WAS IMPLANTED WITH NO KNOWN ISSUE. ON (B)(6) 2019, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT INCOMPATIBLE SCREWS WERE USED WITH THE PLATE, THE SURGEON WAS NOTIFIED. DURING A POST-OPERATIVE X-RAY, THE SURGEON NOTED THAT THE SCREWS AND PLATE WERE BACKING OUT. THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING SOME PAIN AND UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019 TO REPLACE THE PLATE AND SCREWS.

    Patient problems: Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 8522832 ↗
  • InjuryJul 11, 2016Device Slipped; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT; SCREWS BACKED THROUGH THE LOCKING MECHANISM INTO THE PATIENTS VOCAL CHORDS

    Patient problems: Injury; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 5783600 ↗

Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY devices

All APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page