AVS NAVIGATOR 48392080Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · VERTEBRAL SPACER · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AVS NAVIGATOR (12)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252252207), received between Jun 17, 2016 and Jun 17, 2016 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
- Failure to Form Staple1
- Mechanical Problem1
- Mechanics Altered1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 17, 2016Failure to Form Staple; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; FIRST IMPLANT WAS USED WITH BAYONETTED INSERTER AND CAME DISLODGED WHEN INSERTING. RAIL ON IMPLANT APPEARED MALFORMED AND WAS NOT REATTACHED. SURGEON THEN ATTEMPTED TO PLACE DIFFERENT IMPLANT ON STRAIGHT INSERTER AND EXPERIENCED THE SAME OUTCOME. PER SURGEON, NO PATIENT ADVERSE EVENT RESULTED FROM IMPLANTS BEING DISLODGED. SURGEON DID NOT ATTEMPT TO PLACE A THIRD IMPLANT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5732126 ↗MalfunctionJun 17, 2016Mechanical Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Mechanics Altered; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; FIRST IMPLANT WAS USED WITH BAYONETTED INSERTER AND CAME DISLODGED WHEN INSERTING. RAIL ON IMPLANT APPEARED MALFORMED AND WAS NOT REATTACHED. SURGEON THEN ATTEMPTED TO PLACE DIFFERENT IMPLANT ON STRAIGHT INSERTER AND EXPERIENCED THE SAME OUTCOME. PER SURGEON, NO PATIENT ADVERSE EVENT RESULTED FROM IMPLANTS BEING DISLODGED. SURGEON DID NOT ATTEMPT TO PLACE A THIRD IMPLANT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5732103 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page