Skip to content

AVS ARIA 48750110Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · PEEK SPACER · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252310518), received between Sep 5, 2018 and Sep 5, 2018 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture3
  • Material Fragmentation2
  • Break1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 5, 2018Break; Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING LATERAL CAGE INSERTION, THE CAGE BROKE. ANOTHER CAGE OF THE SAME SIZE WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS AT THE L2-L3 LEVEL ANS INSERTION ANGLE WAS NOTED DIFFICULT. ALL BROKEN FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED AND NO REPORTS OF ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7847862 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 5, 2018Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING LATERAL CAGE INSERTION, THE CAGE BROKE. ANOTHER CAGE OF THE SAME SIZE WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS AT THE L2-L3 LEVEL ANS INSERTION ANGLE WAS NOTED DIFFICULT. ALL BROKEN FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED AND NO REPORTS OF ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7847792 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 5, 2018Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING LATERAL CAGE INSERTION, THE CAGE BROKE. ANOTHER CAGE OF THE SAME SIZE WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS AT THE L2-L3 LEVEL ANS INSERTION ANGLE WAS NOTED DIFFICULT. ALL BROKEN FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED AND NO REPORTS OF ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7847791 ↗

Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices

All Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page