AVS ARIA 48750110Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · PEEK SPACER · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252310518), received between Sep 5, 2018 and Sep 5, 2018 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture3
- Material Fragmentation2
- Break1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 5, 2018Break; Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING LATERAL CAGE INSERTION, THE CAGE BROKE. ANOTHER CAGE OF THE SAME SIZE WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS AT THE L2-L3 LEVEL ANS INSERTION ANGLE WAS NOTED DIFFICULT. ALL BROKEN FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED AND NO REPORTS OF ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7847862 ↗MalfunctionSep 5, 2018Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING LATERAL CAGE INSERTION, THE CAGE BROKE. ANOTHER CAGE OF THE SAME SIZE WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS AT THE L2-L3 LEVEL ANS INSERTION ANGLE WAS NOTED DIFFICULT. ALL BROKEN FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED AND NO REPORTS OF ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7847792 ↗MalfunctionSep 5, 2018Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING LATERAL CAGE INSERTION, THE CAGE BROKE. ANOTHER CAGE OF THE SAME SIZE WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS AT THE L2-L3 LEVEL ANS INSERTION ANGLE WAS NOTED DIFFICULT. ALL BROKEN FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED AND NO REPORTS OF ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7847791 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page