Skip to content

HOFFMANN 4933-1-002Recalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · Wire Bolt - Medium LRF For Wire dia1.5 to 2.0mm · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252507796), received between Oct 3, 2019 and May 21, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4
  • Fracture2
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
  • Loss of Osseointegration2
  • Off-Label Use2
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant5
  • Injury2
  • Insufficient Information2
  • No Code Available2
  • Implant Pain1
  • Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 21, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WERE 3 WIRE BREAKAGES. AFTER CONCLUSION OF THE INVESTIGATION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS A CLEAR INDICATION THAT THE WIRE BOLT WASN¿T TIGHTENED ENOUGH.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Implant Pain; Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture

    MAUDE report 19367323 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 4, 2023Break; Fracture; Off-Label Use; Break; Fracture; Off-Label Use

    NO EVENT TO REPORT AS OF YET, AWAITING FURTHER INFORMATION. UPDATE 11 JUL 2023:- "WIRE BREAKAGE".

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17461813 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 4, 2023Break; Fracture; Off-Label Use; Break; Fracture; Off-Label Use

    NO EVENT TO REPORT AS OF YET, AWAITING FURTHER INFORMATION. UPDATE 11 JUL 2023:- "WIRE BREAKAGE".

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17461568 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 2, 2022Break; Break

    THE FOLLOWING EVENT WAS REPORTED BY THE STRYKER REP: "THE HOFFMANN LRF FRAME WAS PUT ON THE PATIENT ON (B)(6) 2021 FOR AN ANKLE FUSION PROCEDURE TO PROTECT THE INTERNAL HARDWARE. PATIENT NOTIFIED THE SURGEON ON (B)(6) 2022 COMPLAINING OF A LOUD 'POP' OR A LOOSE 'CLICKING SOUND. FRAME WAS REMOVED ON THE FOLLOWING DAY (B)(6) 2022. EVERY WIRE BROKE AND NUTS LOOSENED UP. THE SURGEON MENTIONED THE PATIENT WAS NOT WALKING ON IT THROUGHOUT THE FEW WEEKS IT WAS ON."

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 13424190 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 2, 2022Break; Break

    THE FOLLOWING EVENT WAS REPORTED BY THE STRYKER REP: "THE HOFFMANN LRF FRAME WAS PUT ON THE PATIENT ON (B)(6) 2021 FOR AN ANKLE FUSION PROCEDURE TO PROTECT THE INTERNAL HARDWARE. PATIENT NOTIFIED THE SURGEON ON (B)(6) 2022 COMPLAINING OF A LOUD 'POP' OR A LOOSE 'CLICKING SOUND. FRAME WAS REMOVED ON THE FOLLOWING DAY (B)(6) 2022. EVERY WIRE BROKE AND NUTS LOOSENED UP. THE SURGEON MENTIONED THE PATIENT WAS NOT WALKING ON IT THROUGHOUT THE FEW WEEKS IT WAS ON."

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 13423873 ↗
  • InjuryOct 4, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loss of Osseointegration

    AS REPORTED: "A COUPLE OF PROXIMAL PINS IN THE TIBIA IN AN LRF CASE WERE LOOSE." ALSO REPORTED: "THE REVISION WAS DONE DUE TO LOOSENING OF THE THIN WIRES. THE WIRES THAT APPEARED LOOSE WERE REPLACED BY HALF PINS, WHICH BECAME STABLE."

    Patient problems: Injury; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9156818 ↗
  • InjuryOct 3, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loss of Osseointegration

    AS REPORTED: "A COUPLE OF PROXIMAL PINS IN THE TIBIA IN AN LRF CASE WERE LOOSE." ALSO REPORTED: "THE REVISION WAS DONE DUE TO LOOSENING OF THE THIN WIRES. THE WIRES THAT APPEARED LOOSE WERE REPLACED BY HALF PINS, WHICH BECAME STABLE."

    Patient problems: Injury; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9153695 ↗

Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, NAIL/BLADE/PLATE COMBINATION, MULTIPLE COMPONENT devices

All APPLIANCE, FIXATION, NAIL/BLADE/PLATE COMBINATION, MULTIPLE COMPONENT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page