Anato 4845-7-117Recalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · NEUTRAL 130 Degree Neck Angle V40 Hip Stem · Class 2 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252631187), received between Apr 16, 2018 and May 16, 2019 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
Patient problems
- Injury3
- Bone Fracture(s)2
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 16, 2019Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device
AS REPORTED: "[SURGEON] SAYS PATIENT COMPLAINING ABOUT PAIN AFTER PRIMARY HIP REPLACEMENT DONE...ON (B)(6) 2018...DR...BELIEVES STEM SUBSIDED. REVISION SURGERY WAS DONE AND STEM REMOVED. REPLACED WITH RESTORATION MODULAR STEM AND CONE BODY, NO OTHER INFO AVAILABLE..."
Patient problems: Injury; Pain
MAUDE report 8616058 ↗InjuryAug 3, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
DOCTOR REPORTS PATIENT A STATUS OF POST RIGHT DIRECT ANTERIOR HIP REPLACEMENT DONE APPROXIMATELY 3 WEEKS PRIOR HAS A PERI PROSTHETIC FRACTURE OF THE FEMUR WITH THE STEM NOW BEING LOOSE. DOCTOR DECIDED TO REVISE THE STEM TO A RESTORATION MODULAR HIP STEM. THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED PER SURGICAL TECHNIQUE, 2 CABLES WERE APPLIED, A TRIAL REDUCTION WAS PERFORMED. SATISFIED THE FINAL IMPLANTS WERE IMPACTED AND SURGICAL SITE CLOSED. SURGERY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT INCIDENT.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Injury
MAUDE report 7747594 ↗InjuryApr 16, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED. A HEAD AND STEM WERE THE REVISED DEVICES. REP RESPONDED CONFIRMING THE REASON FOR REVISION AS PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Injury
MAUDE report 7435336 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal devices
- UHR UH1-48-28Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal2 recalls3 reports
- "UNITED" USTAR II Knee System 2515-3213United Orthopedic Corp. · Prosthesis, Hip, Hemi-, Femoral, Metal2 recalls0 reports
- "UNITED" USTAR II Knee System 2515-3115United Orthopedic Corp. · Prosthesis, Hip, Hemi-, Femoral, Metal2 recalls0 reports
- STAGEONE 431207Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal2 recalls0 reports
- "UNITED" USTAR II Knee System 2515-3111United Orthopedic Corp. · Prosthesis, Hip, Hemi-, Femoral, Metal2 recalls0 reports
- ACTIS 101011050Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal73 reports
- UHR UH1-46-26Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal1 recall11 reports
- UHR UH1-45-26Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal1 recall11 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.