Neuroform Atlas M003SZAS40240Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · WITHOUT TIP Stent System · Class f · Implant
All models of Neuroform Atlas (18)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252656203), received between Jul 19, 2018 and Sep 23, 2019 — classified as 1 death, 2 injuries, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Activation Failure1
- Device Markings/Labelling Problem1
- Mechanical Jam1
- Premature Separation1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient4
- Death1
- Hematoma1
- Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome1
- Pneumonia1
- Stroke/CVA1
- Thrombosis1
- Thrombus1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 23, 2019Premature Separation; Premature Separation
ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND THE STENT HAD DEPLOYED PREMATURELY DURING USE. THERE WAS NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9106323 ↗MalfunctionMay 10, 2019Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT(SUBJECT DEVICE) RADIOPAQUE MARKERS WERE MISALIGNED. THE PHYSICIAN CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE AND DETACHED THE COIL SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8600483 ↗InjuryApr 12, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THE DURING IMPLANTATION OF THE STENT (SUBJECT DEVICE) INTO THE RIGHT POSTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY (PCA), THE PATIENT SUFFERED A STROKE OF THE DISTAL BASILAR ARTERY. THE PHYSICIAN PERFORMED A THROMBECTOMY AND BLOOD CIRCULATION WAS RESTORED. THE PHYSICIAN SUSPECTS THAT THE STROKE OCCURRED DUE TO THROMBUS FORMATION IN THE STENT LUMEN AT THE TOP OF THE BASILAR ARTERY. THE PATIENT IS CURRENTLY HOSPITALIZED WITH A MID-BRAIN STROKE OF SCORE 18 ON NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE (NHISS). NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Stroke/CVA; Thrombus
MAUDE report 8510339 ↗InjuryFeb 19, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
DURING THE STENT ASSISTED COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THROMBOSIS WAS NOTICED WITHIN THE STENT. THEREFORE, INTRAARTERIAL AGGRASTAT WAS PROVIDED TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Thrombosis
MAUDE report 8351475 ↗MalfunctionSep 10, 2018Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED FROM THE RIGHT POSTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY (PCA) TO THE BASILAR ARTERY (BA). THE STENT OPENED PROXIMALLY IN THE BASILAR ARTERY; HOWEVER, THE DISTAL OF THE STENT DID NOT OPEN IN THE POSTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7860479 ↗MalfunctionAug 3, 2018Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT DELIVERY WIRE BECAME STUCK INSIDE THE DEPLOYED STENT (SUBJECT DEVICE) ALONG WITH THE GUIDEWIRE AND MICROCATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED ALL THREE DEVICES AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7748437 ↗DeathJul 19, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 2 MONTH-POST SUCCESSFUL STENT-ASSISTED COIL EMBOLIZATION OF AN ANEURYSM LOCATED ON THE BASILAR APEX, THE PATIENT MECHANICALLY FELL AND HAD SUBSEQUENT FALCINE SUBDURAL HEMATOMA. HOSPITALIZATION/PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION WAS REQUIRED. THE EVENT WAS RESOLVED WITHOUT RESIDUAL EFFECTS 2 DAYS LATER. EIGHT DAYS POST FALL, THE PATIENT SUFFERED SEVERE ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA AND MULTI ORGAN SYSTEM FAILURE. THE PATIENT DIED 15 DAYS POST FALL. ACCORDING TO THE CLINICAL EVENTS COMMITTEE (CEC), THE FALL AND SUBSEQUENT FALCINE SUBDURAL HEMATOMA WERE RELATED TO PARKINSON'S DISEASE, CONCOMITANT MEDICATION (PLAVIX/ASA), AND ATLAS STENTS (SUBJECT DEVICE) AND SEVERE ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA AND MULTI ORGAN SYSTEM FAILURE WERE RELATED TO PARKINSON'S DISEASE, MEDICAL COMPLICATIONS, AND ATLAS STENTS. HAD THE PATIENT NOT HAD AN INTRACRANIAL STENT, SHE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ON DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY (DAPT), SO THIS EVENT IS DEVICE AND DRUG RELATED.
Patient problems: Death; Hematoma; Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome; Pneumonia
MAUDE report 7704724 ↗
Other intracranial neurovascular stent devices
- CERENOVUS ENTERPRISE ENF402312Medos International Sàrl · intracranial neurovascular stent1 death90 reports
- PulseRider Aneurysm Neck Reconstruction Device 201-DMedos International Sàrl · Intracranial Neurovascular Stent2 deaths74 reports
- CERENOVUS ENTERPRISE ENF402300Medos International Sàrl · intracranial neurovascular stent2 deaths66 reports
- CERENOVUS ENTERPRISE ENF403012Medos International Sàrl · intracranial neurovascular stent1 death42 reports
- CERENOVUS ENTERPRISE ENF452212Medos International Sàrl · intracranial neurovascular stent41 reports
- CERENOVUS ENTERPRISE ENF401612Medos International Sàrl · intracranial neurovascular stent36 reports
- CERENOVUS ENTERPRISE ENF401600Medos International Sàrl · intracranial neurovascular stent36 reports
- CERENOVUS ENTERPRISE ENF452812Medos International Sàrl · intracranial neurovascular stent31 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page