Skip to content

Excelsior XT-17 Flex M003C1715ST0Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · 2 Tip Straight Microcatheter · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252714903), received between Nov 4, 2022 and Jun 5, 2026 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture5
  • Device Misassembled During Manufacturing /Shipping1
  • Material Puncture/Hole1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 5, 2026Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE COIL REACHED A POSITION APPROXIMATELY 4MM FROM THE MARKER AT THE TIP OF THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER, THE PHYSICIAN FOUND THAT THE COIL HAD ALREADY PUSHED OUT OF THE TIP OF THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN THEN WITHDREW THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER AND FOUND THAT THE TIP OF THE MICROCATHETER WAS BROKEN. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25411074 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 2, 2025Device Misassembled During Manufacturing /Shipping; Device Misassembled During Manufacturing /Shipping

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SECOND MARKER ON THE DISTAL END OF THE MICROCATHETER (SUBJECT DEVICE) HAD SEPARATED AND DETACHED FROM THE MICROCATHETER SHAFT WHEN THE MICROCATHETER WAS UNPACKED. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21953451 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 16, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE LEFT MIDDLE CAROTID ARTERY (MCA) PROCEDURE, THE OPERATOR DELIVERED A SUBJECT MICROCATHETER TO THE DESIGNATED POSITION AND THEN DELIVERED A STENT THROUGH THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER. WHEN THE STENT WAS APPROXIMATELY 5CM FROM THE TIP OF THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER, THE OPERATOR NOTICED THAT THE MARKER AT THE STENT'S DISTAL END HAD OPENED. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE MICROCATHETER AND STENT WERE WITHDRAWN TOGETHER. UPON WITHDRAWAL, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER HAD BROKEN APPROXIMATELY 5CM FROM ITS TIP, WHICH WAS THE LOCATION WHERE THE STENT'S DISTAL END HAD OPENED. AFTER OBSERVING THAT THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS MAINTAINED, THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THE SURGERY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21850595 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 9, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A M2 BIFURCATION ANEURYSM CASE, SUBJECT MICROCATHETER WAS USED TO DEPLOY A STENT. WHILE DOING SO, THE OPERATOR CHECKED UNDER DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY (DSA) AND FOUND THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER MIGRATED DOWNWARD THE ANEURYSM AND COULD NOT BE DELIVERED TO THE LOCATION ANYMORE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE SHAFT OF THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18474904 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 27, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING STENT IMPLANTATION ANEURYSM EMBOLIZATION CASE, A BIG RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN DELIVERING THE STENT THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER (SUBJECT DEVICE) AND THE STENT WAS HARD TO BE ADVANCED. FINALLY, WHEN IT REACHED TO THE TIP OF THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER, THE RESISTANCE BECAME BIGGER AND ONLY THE TIP OF THE STENT COULD BE DEPLOYED. THEREFORE, THE STENT AND THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER WERE WITHDRAWN TOGETHER. IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE SEGMENT AT THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER NEAR THE TAIL OF THE STENT WAS FRACTURED. THE STENT AND SUBJECT MICROCATHETER WERE REPLACED WITH OTHER PRODUCTS TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16448923 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 10, 2022Fracture; Fracture

    PRIOR PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE (SAH) AND ACOMA ANEURYSM. THE GUIDEWIRE WAS USED TO DELIVER THE ECHELON-10 MICROCATHETER TO THE ANEURYSM AND THEN FILLED WITH COILS. WHEN DELIVERING THE STENT INTO THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER, THE RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED AND THE CATHETER SHAFT (SUBJECT DEVICE) NEAR THE HUB WAS FRACTURED WHEN DELIVERED WITH FORCE. THE PHYSICIAN REPLACED IT WITH A NEW DEVICE AND CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15772740 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2022Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole

    THE MICROCATHETER (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE SUBJECT DEVICE SHAFT HAD A HOLE/PERFORATION. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15740157 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page