V40 Head 6260-4-122Recalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · V40 Femoral Head · Class 2 · Implant
All models of V40 Head (30)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327012798), received between Jul 30, 2018 and May 20, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Degraded” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Degraded1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Patient-Device Incompatibility1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Injury3
- Joint Dislocation2
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
- Foreign Body Reaction1
- Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1
- Metal Related Pathology1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 20, 2025Degraded; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Degraded; Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED:" AROUND AUTUMN 2024, THE PATIENT WAS FOUND TO HAVE A METAL (COBALT CHROME) ALLERGY, AND THERE WAS A POSSIBILITY THAT THE REVISION WOULD BE PERFORMED AGAIN. AFTER THAT, THE PATIENT REQUESTED THAT THE SURGERY BE PERFORMED. REVISION THA WAS PERFORMED ON THE PATIENT. ALTHOUGH THERE WAS NO LOOSENING OR MALPOSITIONING OF THE IMPLANTS OR ANY NOTICEABLE DAMAGE, DAMAGE TO THE SOFT TISSUE (PARTICULARLY THE GLUTEUS MEDIUS MUSCLE) WAS OBSERVED. WHEN THE IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED, WHITE TISSUE WAS FOUND TO BE STUCK TO THE INNER SURFACE OF THE CUP (BETWEEN THE TRIDENT II-MDM LINER). REQUEST FROM THE DOCTOR. ALTHOUGH IT IS THOUGHT THAT THIS PHENOMENON MAY BE DUE TO AN ALLERGIC REACTION OF THE PATIENT TO THE CO-CR ALLOY IMPLANT, THE DOCTOR BELIEVES THAT THERE MAY BE OTHER FACTORS INVOLVED, AS THE SOFT TISSUE DAMAGE WAS SEVERE AND THERE WAS A LOT OF TISSUE ADHESION BETWEEN THE CUP AND LINER. THE DOCTOR HAS REQUESTED THAT STRYKER INVESTIGATE THE EXTENT AND CAUSE OF DAMAGE AND WEAR OF THE DEVICES THAT WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6)."
Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction; Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction; Metal Related Pathology
MAUDE report 22057199 ↗InjuryMar 1, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT HAS BEEN REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT AFTER PROCEDURE THE METAL HEAD WAS DISSOCIATED FROM THE STEM NECK. UPDATE 05/FEBRUARY/2021: AS ALSO REPORTED IN THE INTAKE FORM: "RETURNED TO (REVISE) THE PATIENT TO REMOVE THE IMPLANTED HEAD AND IMPLANTED BIPOLAR CUP AND PLACE A NEW ONE." UPDATE 08/FEBRUARY/2021, A HIP IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2021 FAILED AND WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 11396701 ↗InjuryOct 17, 2019Unstable; Unstable
THIS PI IS FOR REVISION OF THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP ON (B)(6) 2019. PROCEDURE: THE PATIENT HAD RIGHT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT OUTSIDE HOSPITAL (B)(6) 2011. AFTER THE HIP REPLACEMENT, PATIENT PRESENTED WITH INSTABILITY FAILURE, THEN UNDERWENT REVISION WITH REMAINING CUP, OTHER COMPONENTS EXCHANGED (B)(6) 2018. BECAUSE OF EXTENSIVE SOFT TISSUE DESTRUCTION THAT LED PATIENT PRESENTING SYMPTOM OF INSTABILITY, PATIENT UNDERWENT RIGHT TOTAL HIP REVISION LINER, HEAD, AND PROXIMAL RMS (BODY) COMPONENTS EXCHANGED ON (B)(6) 2019.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 9202366 ↗InjuryNov 20, 2018Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
"EVENT: PATIENT'S CONSTRAINED LINER DISLOCATED. CONSTRAINED LINER/ SHELL WERE REMOVED AND CONSTRAINED LINER IMPLANTED. ". UPDATE 25/OCTOBER/2018: REP REPORTED THE FOLLOWING: THE BIPOLAR DISLOCATED OUT OF THE LINER. CONSTRAINED LINER WAS SECURELY LOCKED IN SHELL. NEW HEAD WAS IMPLANTED INCREASING LENGTH FROM +0 TO +8. SURGEON CHOSE TO REVISE SHELL TO NEW TRITANIUM REVISION SHELL. OLD SHELL CAME OUT EASILY. NO POSSIBLE CAUSES FOR DISLOCATION.
Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 8090178 ↗InjuryJul 30, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 22MM HEAD WAS WRONG TO IMPLANT WITH 26MM CUP AND LINER. THIS EVENT WAS FOUND AFTER OPERATION AND THE HEAD WAS CHANGED THE CORRECT SIZE.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 7731390 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices
- PINNACLE 1217-25-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED735 reports
- NA 1365-52-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED683 reports
- APEX 1246-03-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED3 deaths613 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-20-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED2 deaths590 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-30-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED1 death484 reports
- NA 1365-53-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED404 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED388 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-32-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED386 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page