Skip to content

V40 Head 6260-5-228Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · V40 Femoral Head · Class 2 · Implant

All models of V40 Head (30)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327012897), received between Dec 6, 2018 and Sep 23, 2024 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Corroded1
  • Degraded1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Material Erosion1

Patient problems

  • Inflammation2
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Metal Related Pathology2
  • Reaction2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Foreign Body Reaction1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 23, 2024Degraded; Degraded

    AS REPORTED BY THE REP: "IT WAS A COMBINATION OF AN ACCOLADE 1 STEM AND COCR +HEAD. IT LOOKS LIKE THE PATIENT IS POTENTIALLY LOOKING TO CHECK/PURSUE ANY INCOMPATIBILITY AS THEY EXPERIENCED METALLOSIS. I HAVE FORWARDED THE HIP COMPOSITION GUIDE. RIGHT HIP; EVENT WAS NOTICED VIA MRI DONE AT CLINIC WHICH SHOWED PSEUDOTUMOR AND ELEVATED METAL ION LEVELS. ELEVATED METAL ION LEVELS (BOTH COBALT AND CHROMIUM ELEVATED) POST PRIMARY SURGERY. DURING REVISION SURGERY, TRUNNIONOSIS WAS NOTED.".

    Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction; Metal Related Pathology

    MAUDE report 20284818 ↗
  • InjurySep 4, 2024Loss of Osseointegration; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Loss of Osseointegration; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE HIP JOINT DISLOCATED, AND A REVISION WAS NECESSARY. THE PATIENT HAD A UHR HEAD AND AN ACCOLADE II STEM. INTRAOPERATIVELY, IT TURNED OUT THAT THE HEAD WAS NOT HELD ON THE STEM, AND THE OPERATOR REMOVED THE HEAD FROM THE STEM CONE WITHOUT ANY RESISTANCE. AFTER REMOVING THE HEAD AND STEM, STIMULAN WAS USED BECAUSE THE PATIENT HAD AN INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Joint Dislocation; Periprosthetic fracture; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20140626 ↗
  • InjuryAug 2, 2022Corroded; Material Erosion; Corroded; Material Erosion

    IT HAS BEEN REPORTED "A REVISION SURGERY WAS REQUIRED DUE TO "RAISED METAL ION LEVELS". SURGEON REPORTED SIGNS OF METALLOSIS AT THE FEMORAL HEAD/TAPER IMPLANT JUNCTION. THE SURGEON DECIDED THE BEST THING FOR THE PATIENT WAS TO REMOVE THE MILLED BODY AND REPLACE IT WITH THE SAME SIZED ONE AND PUT A CERAMIC HEAD ON".

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Metal Related Pathology

    MAUDE report 15154200 ↗
  • InjuryJun 21, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED BY PATIENT'S ATTORNEY AS A RESULT OF A LEGAL CLAIM THAT ALLEGEDLY ON (B)(6) 2019 THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A LEFT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY AND WAS IMPLANTED WITH AN ACCOLADE II 127° NECK ANGLE HIP STEM AND A V40 FEMORAL HEAD WHICH RESULTED IN REVISION AND PERSONAL INJURIES. UPDATE: PER LEGAL, "THE ALLEGATIONS ARE FOR THE ACCOLADE II STEM AND THE V40 HEAD. CURRENTLY WE DO NOT KNOW WHY THE PATIENT WAS REVISED OR WHAT DEVICES WERE EXPLANTED."

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12030829 ↗
  • InjuryJan 24, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    PHARMACIST FROM THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THE FOLLOWING EVENT: " INVOLVEMENT OF THE MEDICAL DEVICE IN THE OCCURRENCE OF METALLOSIS: CHROME-COBALT POISONING WITH CARDIOPATHY ON PROSTHESIS PLACED IN 2014. "

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Reaction

    MAUDE report 8273819 ↗
  • InjuryDec 6, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO METALLOSIS AFTER PATIENT COMPLAINT OF PAIN AND DIFFICULTY AMBULATING. A 28 +4 HEAD AND 28 10° E LINER WERE REVISED TO A 32 0° LINER AND CERAMIC HEAD WITH SLEEVE. A RESTORATION PS STEM AND TRIDENT PSL CLUSTER SHELL WERE NOT REVISED.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Inflammation; Injury; Pain; Reaction

    MAUDE report 8137848 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page