Skip to content

UHR UH1-44-28Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Bipolar Component · Class 2 · Implant

All models of UHR (41)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327016895), received between Jul 3, 2018 and Oct 26, 2023 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jul 30, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified

    Affected devices were manufactured with Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) raw material aged in excess of five years. Product has the potential for elevated levels of oxidation, which may result in increased wear, leading to hazards such as excessive wear debris, material fragments, fractured device, or disassociated device. Potential harms include revision surgery, pain, and inflammation.

    Z-3199-2026 · Root cause: Process change control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1

Patient problems

  • Pain5
  • Joint Dislocation2
  • Erosion1
  • Injury1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 26, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    DISLOCATION OCCURRED AFTER BIPOLAR HEAD REPLACEMENT, AND REVISION TO THA WAS PERFORMED 2 WEEKS LATER.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 18009586 ↗
  • InjuryApr 20, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED. AS REPORTED: "THE REVISION TODAY WAS PERFORMED SECONDARY TO PAIN IN THE BIPOLAR HIP REPLACEMENT." AN ENTIRE HEMI HIP CONSTRUCT WAS CONVERTED TO A TOTAL HIP CONSTRUCT.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 16782260 ↗
  • InjuryNov 1, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HEMI HIP WAS REVISED. ORIGINALLY, THE BIPOLAR COMPONENT DISLOCATED FROM THE PATIENT'S NATIVE ACETABULUM. A CLOSED REDUCTION WAS ATTEMPTED, AND THE BIPOLAR COMPONENT DISSOCIATED FROM THE FEMORAL HEAD. THE BIPOLAR COMPONENT AND HEAD WERE REVISED.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 15712732 ↗
  • InjuryMay 18, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED. A BIPOLAR COMPONENT AND FEMORAL HEAD WERE REVISED TO A TOTAL HIP CONSTRUCT. AS REPORTED BY REP: "THE REVISION WAS DUE TO JOINT PAIN. NO OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM THE DOCTOR OR HOSPITAL."

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 14432681 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED: "THIS WAS A RIGHT SIDE HIP REVISION PERFORMED DUE TO PAINFUL BIPOLAR HIP. NO OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM HOSPITAL." SPOKE TO REP: THE SURGEON DID NOT REPORT THE POSSIBLE CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTOR FOR THE PAIN. HIP WAS CONVERTED FROM BIPOLAR TO THA. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12791688 ↗
  • InjuryJul 6, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT HAS BEEN REPORTED BY A LAWYER - "MY CLIENT, ON (B)(6) 2016, WAS SUBMITTED FOR SURGERY OF RIGHT HIP ARTHROPLASTY AND PROSTHESIS IMPLANTED AS FOLLOWS: STYKER V40TM FEMORAL HEAD - OD 28MM - OFFSR 0MM - REF 6260-5-128 - LOT 56124001; ABGTM II FEMORAL STEM - RIGHT - SZE # 3 - SDE RT¿ - TPR V40TM - REF 4845-0103 - LOT G5531395A; UHR UNIVERSAL HEAD BIPOLAR COMPONENT - OD 44 MM - ID 28MM - REF UH1-44-28 - LOT T55JYH; MY CLIENT, RIGHT FROM HER APPLICATION, ACCUSED ENORMOUS DISCOMFORT AND MOBILITY PROBLEMS WHICH, BY HERSELF AND BY THE DOCTORS CONSULTED, WERE LINKED TO THE NORMAL PERIOD OF ABSORPTION AND ADAPTATION TO THE AFOREMENTIONED PROSTHESIS; ON (B)(6) 2017, JUST OVER A YEAR LATER, MY CLIENT WAS FORCED TO HOSPITALIZE AGAIN WITH THE FOLLOWING DIAGNOSIS: "COTYLOIDITIS IN RESULTS OF HIP ENDOPROTESIS"; THEREFORE, ON (B)(6) 2017, MY CLIENT UNDERWENT A NEW SURGERY OF "COTILE DX REPLACEMENT"; "...AFTER JUST OVER A YEAR TO AN INTERVENTION OF REPLACEMENT OF THE CUP OF THE ARTHROPLASTY IMPLANTED IN MY CLIENT..."

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12123832 ↗
  • InjuryDec 18, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    (B)(6) 2020, DR (B)(6) I+D OF RIGHT HIP, PRE OP DX INFECTED RIGHT TOTAL HIP. ORIGINAL IMPLANT DATE: (B)(6) 2020, DR . REMOVED 44' BIPOLAR HEAD AND 28+ METAL HEAD. NO INFORMATION AS PER HOSPITAL, EXPLANTS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN, SAME SIZE COMPONENTS RE-IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 11035781 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENTS' RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO GROIN PAIN. PATIENT'S CARTILAGE WAS REPORTED WORN OUT, OTHERWISE NO DEVICES WERE OBSERVED TO BE LOOSE OR BROKEN. PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A TRIDENT II CONSTRUCT.

    Patient problems: Erosion; Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 7658613 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal devices

All Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page