UHR UH1-50-26Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327017090), received between Nov 2, 2017 and Aug 31, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryAug 31, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  It was reported that the patient's Left hemi hip was revised due to dislocation of the bipolar component from the patient's native acetabulum. A 50mm bipolar component and 26 +4 LFIT head were revised to a 52mm bipolar component and another 26 +4 LFIT head. Rep confirmed there were no allegations against the revised femoral head, and that no further information will be released by the hospital or surgeon.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 50516759 ↗
• InjuryMar 6, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO INSTABILITY AND DISLOCATION. SURGEON REPORTED THAT A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR WAS THE PATIENT'S NON-COMPLIANCE WITH POST-OP INSTRUCTIONS. AFTER A CLOSED REDUCTION WAS ATTEMPTED AND FAILED, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE BIPOLAR COMPONENT DISSOCIATED FROM THE FEMORAL HEAD. ALL IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED AND A GIRDLESTONE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

  Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties

  MAUDE report 21535308 ↗
• InjuryMar 19, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A DISLOCATED BIPOLAR CONSTRUCT ( REP CONFIRMED BIPOLAR COMPONENT DISLOCATED FROM PATIENT'S NATIVE ACETABULUM) AND POSITIVE TEST RESULTS FOR INFECTION. DR. OPTED TO PERFORM AN EXTENSIVE I&D AND SWAP OUT THE COMPONENTS LISTED ON THE PREVIOUS SURGERY SHEET. HE USED A CEMENT-IN-CEMENT TECHNIQUE TO IMPLANT A NEW EXETER STEM AND DOWN-SIZED THE UHT BIPOLAR COMPONENT DUE TO CONCERNS THE PREVIOUS UHT COMPONENT WAS POSSIBLY OVERSIZED. NO COMPLAINTS FILED AGAINST THE COMPONENTS THEMSELVES, NO FURTHER INFO AVAILABLE.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 18934898 ↗
• InjuryDec 13, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  AS REPORTED: "REVISED THIS HEMI TO A THA FOLLOWING SOME PATIENT-COMPLAINTS APPARENT HETEROTOPIC-OSSIFICATION VIEWED IN PRE-OP IMAGING. NO COMPLAINTS HAVE BEEN FILED AGAINST THE IMPLANTS THEMSELVES." A 26 -3 MM LFIT V40 HEAD WAS REVISED TO A 28 + 8MM LFIT V40 HEAD. SPOKE TO REP: PATIENT WAS REVISED TO COMPETITOR ACETABULAR COMPONENTS.

  Patient problems: Extraskeletal ossification

  MAUDE report 12982212 ↗
• InjuryJan 5, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS CONVERTED FROM A HEMI TO A TOTAL HIP DUE TO DISLOCATION OF THE UNIVERSAL BIPOLAR HEAD FROM THE PATIENT'S NATIVE ACETABULUM. THE BIPOLAR COMPONENT AND FEMORAL HEAD WERE REMOVED AND A SHELL, LINER, AND FEMORAL HEAD WERE IMPLANTED. THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED FEMORAL HEAD. THE REPORTING REP DOES NOT KNOW IF ANY STRYKER REPS WERE PRESENT FOR THE REVISION PROCEDURE. SALES BRANCH PROVIDED THE PRIMARY USAGE SHEET. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 11116723 ↗
• InjuryNov 13, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

  AS REPORTED: "PATIENT PRESENTED WITH ACUTE INFECTION OF THE [LEFT] HIP. SURGEON PERFORMED EXTENSIVE IRRIGATION AND DEBRIDEMENT OF THE HIP. THE FEMORAL HEAD AND BIPOLAR COMPONENTS WERE SWAPPED OUT AS PART OF THE SURGEON'S I&D PROTOCOL. EXPLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE TO BE RETURNED AS PER HOSPITAL POLICY. NO COMPLAINTS FILED AGAINST THE IMPLANTS." SPOKE TO REP, WHO SUPPLIED THE REVISION USAGE SHEET. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE AVAILABLE.

  Patient problems: Injury; Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 9316061 ↗
• InjuryApr 30, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  PATIENT PRESENTED FOR DISLOCATED/DISSOCIATED BIPOLAR HEAD SIX MONTHS POST IMPLANTATION. WAS REVISED TO A BIPOLAR HEAD WITH A LONGER FEMORAL HEAD OFFSET.

  Patient problems: Injury

  MAUDE report 8565533 ↗
• InjuryNov 2, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO A DISLOCATION FOLLOWING A FALL. THE BIPOLAR COMPONENT AND HEAD WERE REVISED TO A STRYKER SHELL, LINER, AND HEAD WITH MULTIPLE SCREWS. SURGEON REPORTED THAT THE STEM WAS WELL FIXED AND WELL POSITIONED, AND WAS NOT REVISED.

  Patient problems: Fall; Injury; Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 6996826 ↗