Skip to content

UHR UH1-54-26Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Bipolar Component · Class 2 · Implant

All models of UHR (41)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327017243), received between Jan 17, 2017 and Jun 19, 2020 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Injury2
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 19, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION OF THE BIPOLAR HEAD FROM THE PATIENT'S ACETABULUM. DUE TO THE PATIENT'S COMPLEX HISTORY , ALL IMPLANTS EXCEPT THE MODULAR DISTAL STEM WERE REMOVED AND A GIRDLESTONE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED. REP PROVIDED USAGE REPORTS FROM PRIOR REVISIONS AND CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 10173170 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 19, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION WILL BE PERFORMED ON THE PATIENT'S HIP. AN IRRIGATION AND DEBRIDEMENT WITH REVISION OF THE BIPOLAR COMPONENT AND FEMORAL HEAD WILL BE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020. THE REASON FOR THE REVISION WAS NOT REPORTED TO THE REP. REP PROVIDED THE USAGE SHEET FROM HER PREVIOUS SURGERY. THE REP MAY BE ABLE TO OBTAIN USAGE INFORMATION FOR THE UPCOMING REVISION. AS NO STRYKER REP WILL BE PRESENT FOR THE PROCEDURE, REP REPORTED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 9726799 ↗
  • InjuryJan 17, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED PATIENT WITH HIP REPLACEMENT HAD AN INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 6256086 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal devices

All Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page