Secur-Fit 2051-2046Recalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Cluster Acetabular Shell · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Secur-Fit (45)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327020281), received between Sep 24, 2018 and Oct 8, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Malposition of Device” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Malposition of Device4
- Positioning Problem2
- Loss of Osseointegration1
- Osseointegration Problem1
Patient problems
- Injury3
- Joint Dislocation3
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 8, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO SHELL LOOSENING. THE SHELL, LINER AND HEAD WERE REVISED TO A COMPETITOR SHELL AND LINER WITH A NEW STRYKER HEAD. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASE BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 23248708 ↗InjurySep 26, 2018Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A FILED LAWSUIT, THAT ALLEGEDLY, "THE SALES PERSONNEL FAILED TO BRING THE PROPER INSERT TO SURGERY (A CONSTRAINED INSERT) AND THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY THEREAFTER SUFFERED DISLOCATION AND HAD TO ULTIMATELY GO BACK TO SURGERY AND HAVE THE CONSTRAINED LINER IMPLANTED." THIS PI TO COVER REVISION ON (B)(6) 2010 FOR ALLEGED INSTABILITY AS A RESULT OF A CONSTRAINED LINER NOT AVAILABLE AT TIME OF PREVIOUS REVISION ON (B)(6) 2010. PER MEDICAL REVIEW: "ON (B)(6) 2010 A REVISION OF THE RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY TO A CONSTRAINED LINER WAS PERFORMED FOR A DIAGNOSIS OF UNSTABLE RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY...THE OPERATIVE REPORT STATES, "ACETABULUM MAY BE A LITTLE MORE VERTICAL THAN NORMAL."
Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 7910009 ↗InjurySep 25, 2018Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
ON (B)(6) 2010 THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF POPPING IN THE HIP AND ON (B)(6) 2010 SHE SUSTAINED A DISLOCATION, WHICH WAS TREATED WITH CLOSED REDUCTION, AND THE PLAN WAS TO INSERT A CONSTRAINED LINER." THE OPERATIVE REPORT STATES, "ACETABULUM MAY BE A LITTLE MORE VERTICAL THAN NORMAL."
Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 7906661 ↗InjurySep 25, 2018Malposition of Device; Positioning Problem; Malposition of Device; Positioning Problem
PER MEDICAL REVIEW, PATIENT HAD A CLOSED REDUCTION ON (B)(6) 2009 DUE TO DISLOCATION. MEDICAL REVIEW NOTES: "THE OPERATIVE REPORT STATES, "ACETABULUM MAY BE A LITTLE MORE VERTICAL THAN NORMAL".
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 7906279 ↗InjurySep 24, 2018Malposition of Device; Positioning Problem; Malposition of Device; Positioning Problem
PER MEDICAL REVIEW: "ON (B)(6) 2010 A REVISION OF THE RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY WITH EXCHANGE OF THE POLY INSERT AND FEMORAL HEAD WAS PERFORMED FOR A DIAGNOSIS OF POLY WEAR RIGHT HIP." MEDICAL REVIEW NOTES OPERATIVE REPORT DATED (B)(6) 2010 STATES: "ACETABULUM MAY BE A LITTLE MORE VERTICAL THAN NORMAL".
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 7903852 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page