Skip to content

Secur-Fit 2051-2046Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Cluster Acetabular Shell · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Secur-Fit (45)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327020281), received between Sep 24, 2018 and Oct 8, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Malposition of Device” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Malposition of Device4
  • Positioning Problem2
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Injury3
  • Joint Dislocation3
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 8, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO SHELL LOOSENING. THE SHELL, LINER AND HEAD WERE REVISED TO A COMPETITOR SHELL AND LINER WITH A NEW STRYKER HEAD. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASE BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 23248708 ↗
  • InjurySep 26, 2018Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A FILED LAWSUIT, THAT ALLEGEDLY, "THE SALES PERSONNEL FAILED TO BRING THE PROPER INSERT TO SURGERY (A CONSTRAINED INSERT) AND THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY THEREAFTER SUFFERED DISLOCATION AND HAD TO ULTIMATELY GO BACK TO SURGERY AND HAVE THE CONSTRAINED LINER IMPLANTED." THIS PI TO COVER REVISION ON (B)(6) 2010 FOR ALLEGED INSTABILITY AS A RESULT OF A CONSTRAINED LINER NOT AVAILABLE AT TIME OF PREVIOUS REVISION ON (B)(6) 2010. PER MEDICAL REVIEW: "ON (B)(6) 2010 A REVISION OF THE RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY TO A CONSTRAINED LINER WAS PERFORMED FOR A DIAGNOSIS OF UNSTABLE RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY...THE OPERATIVE REPORT STATES, "ACETABULUM MAY BE A LITTLE MORE VERTICAL THAN NORMAL."

    Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 7910009 ↗
  • InjurySep 25, 2018Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    ON (B)(6) 2010 THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF POPPING IN THE HIP AND ON (B)(6) 2010 SHE SUSTAINED A DISLOCATION, WHICH WAS TREATED WITH CLOSED REDUCTION, AND THE PLAN WAS TO INSERT A CONSTRAINED LINER." THE OPERATIVE REPORT STATES, "ACETABULUM MAY BE A LITTLE MORE VERTICAL THAN NORMAL."

    Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 7906661 ↗
  • InjurySep 25, 2018Malposition of Device; Positioning Problem; Malposition of Device; Positioning Problem

    PER MEDICAL REVIEW, PATIENT HAD A CLOSED REDUCTION ON (B)(6) 2009 DUE TO DISLOCATION. MEDICAL REVIEW NOTES: "THE OPERATIVE REPORT STATES, "ACETABULUM MAY BE A LITTLE MORE VERTICAL THAN NORMAL".

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 7906279 ↗
  • InjurySep 24, 2018Malposition of Device; Positioning Problem; Malposition of Device; Positioning Problem

    PER MEDICAL REVIEW: "ON (B)(6) 2010 A REVISION OF THE RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY WITH EXCHANGE OF THE POLY INSERT AND FEMORAL HEAD WAS PERFORMED FOR A DIAGNOSIS OF POLY WEAR RIGHT HIP." MEDICAL REVIEW NOTES OPERATIVE REPORT DATED (B)(6) 2010 STATES: "ACETABULUM MAY BE A LITTLE MORE VERTICAL THAN NORMAL".

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 7903852 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page