Skip to content

Secur-Fit 2051-2048Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Cluster Acetabular Shell · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Secur-Fit (45)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327020304), received between Dec 20, 2021 and Apr 19, 2022 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Malposition of Device” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Malposition of Device1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Dislocation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 19, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO CHRONIC DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINER. A STEM, HEAD, LINER AND SHELL WERE REVISED. REP REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON WANTED TO ADD MORE VERSION AND STABILITY TO THE CONSTRUCT. PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A MULTI-HOLE SHELL, MDM/ ADM LINER CONSTRUCT, FEMORAL HEAD, AND EXETER STEM.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 14141862 ↗
  • InjuryDec 20, 2021Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINER. THE SURGEON DECIDED HE WANTED TO REPOSITION THE SHELL, AND TO USE A SHELL THAT COULD ACCOMMODATE AN MDM LINER. UPON REDUCTION, SURGEON SAID THE STEM WAS TOO SHORT FOR THE CONSTRUCT, AND REVISED THE STEM. THE SHELL AND STEM (IMPLANTED APPROXIMATELY 20 YEARS AGO), AND HEAD AND LINER (IMPLANTED (B)(6) 2021) WERE REVISED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 13047942 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page