Secur-Fit 6051-1035SRecalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 132 Degree Neck Angle Hip Stem · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Secur-Fit (45)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327021042), received between Nov 9, 2017 and Sep 18, 2020 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K041170, K051738); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
- Material Deformation1
- Migration1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
Patient problems
- Injury4
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Inflammation1
- Joint Dislocation1
- Pain1
- Reaction1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 18, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. POSSIBLE CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTOR FOR PAIN NOT REPORTED. THE PATIENT'S STEM AND HEAD WERE REVISED TO A RESTORATION MODULAR STEM CONSTRUCT AND ANOTHER HEAD.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 10552389 ↗InjuryJan 4, 2019Migration; Migration
PATIENT UNDERWENT A PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT (B)(6) 2017. SHE DID FINE UNTIL RECENT FOLLOW UP SHOWED SUBSIDENCE OF THE STEM. SHE HAD A LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY. SHE WAS SCHEDULED FOR REVISION. THE STEM WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A RESTORATION MODULAR CONE CONICAL STEM. OPERATION WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Injury
MAUDE report 8218992 ↗InjuryDec 12, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO A FEMORAL PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE (POSSIBLE CAUSE/ CONTRIBUTOR FOR FRACTURE NOT REPORTED) PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A RESTORATION MODULAR STEM CONSTRUCT WITH COMPETITOR CERCLAGE WIRE.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Injury
MAUDE report 8157513 ↗InjuryMay 7, 2018Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION CAUSED BY STEM SUBSIDENCE.
Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 7491324 ↗InjuryNov 9, 2017Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT'S HIP WAS REVISED. IT WAS REPORTED ON OPENING THE JOINT CAPSULE THAT THERE WAS METALLOSIS AND TRUNNIONOSIS, AND THE HEAD WAS LOOSE.
Patient problems: Inflammation; Injury; Reaction
MAUDE report 7014242 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K041170, K051738. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0893-2009 · Nov 13, 2008 · TerminatedSecur-Fit Max Hip Stem These devices are modular components of a total hip system. These femoral stems are intended for use with femoral heads and acetabular components in primary
- Z-0894-2009 · Nov 13, 2008 · TerminatedPrimary Secur-fit Plus Max Hip Stem These devices are modular components of a total hip system. These femoral stems are intended for use with femoral heads and acetabular componen
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page