Skip to content

Secur-Fit 6051-1140SRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 132 Degree Neck Angle Hip Stem · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Secur-Fit (45)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327021059), received between Apr 5, 2019 and Nov 30, 2020 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K041170, K051738); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Fall1
  • Hip Fracture1
  • Injury1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 30, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO THE PATIENT FALLING AND CAUSING A PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE. THE STEM WAS REVISED FROM A #11 132° SECUR-FIT MAX STEM TO A RESTORATION MODULAR HIP SYSTEM DUE TO FRACTURE AND SUBSIDENCE. SPOKE TO REP, THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE HEAD OR THE SLEEVE, NO RETURNS ARE AVAILABLE DUE TO HOSPITAL POLICY AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Fall

    MAUDE report 10920014 ↗
  • InjuryApr 5, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED. PATIENT FELT A POP IN HER HIP WITH TEMPORARY PAIN WHICH SUBSIDED. X-RAYS SHOWED THE EXISTENCE OF A FEMORAL PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE. A SECURFIT MAX STEM AND BIOLOX CERAMIC HEAD WERE REVISED TO A RESTORATION MODULAR STEM CONSTRUCT AND ANOTHER STRYKER FEMORAL HEAD, AND 4 SETS OF CABLES. REP PROVIDED PRE- AND POST-REVISION X-RAYS AND THE PRIMARY IMPLANT SHEET AND REPORTED THAT THE NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED.

    Patient problems: Hip Fracture; Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 8486683 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K041170, K051738. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0894-2009 · Nov 13, 2008 · Terminated
    Primary Secur-fit Plus Max Hip Stem These devices are modular components of a total hip system. These femoral stems are intended for use with femoral heads and acetabular componen
  • Z-0893-2009 · Nov 13, 2008 · Terminated
    Secur-Fit Max Hip Stem These devices are modular components of a total hip system. These femoral stems are intended for use with femoral heads and acetabular components in primary

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page