Secur-Fit 6052-1035SRecalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 127 Degree Neck Angle Hip Stem · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Secur-Fit (45)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327021134), received between Jun 13, 2017 and Mar 16, 2023 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K041170, K051738); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
Patient problems
- Bone Fracture(s)3
- Injury2
- Hip Fracture1
- Inflammation1
- Pain1
- Reaction1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 16, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED. AS REPORTED: "PATIENT HAD A PROXIMAL FEMUR FRACTURE SO WAS REVISED. ALL COMPONENTS WERE EXPLANTED. NO OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE DUE TO HOSPITAL POLICY." THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED FEMORAL HEAD OR ENDO HEAD.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 16551293 ↗InjuryJan 26, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO FEMORAL PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE. A SECUR-FIT MAX STEM, UNITRAX HEAD, AND SLEEVE WERE REVISED TO A RESTORATION MODULAR STEM CONSTRUCT WITH ANOTHER UNITRAX HEAD AND SLEEVE, AND A CABLE AND SLEEVE SET. REP PROVIDED PRIMARY AND REVISION USAGE SHEETS. REP CONFIRMED THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED IMPLANTS, AND THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 13362084 ↗InjuryJul 22, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE SUBMISSION OF A REVISION USAGE SHEET THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE. A 36 + 5MM BIOLOX HEAD AND #10 SECUR-FIT STEM WERE EXPLANTED. SPOKE TO REP: THE FRACTURE OCCURRED ON THE FEMUR BONE, ABOUT HALF WAY UP THE LENGTH OF THE STEM, BUT THE STEM WAS NOT FRACTURED. THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED HEAD. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Hip Fracture
MAUDE report 12211670 ↗InjuryJul 14, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A POLY INSERT AND A C-TAPER FEMORAL HEAD "WERE EXPLANTED DURING A RIGHT HIP REVISION DUE TO ALTR." REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Inflammation; Injury; Reaction
MAUDE report 10269987 ↗InjuryJun 13, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED A RIGHT HIP REVISION DUE TO PAIN. UPDATE: 05/23/2017 - COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON MENTIONED THAT THERE MAY HAVE BEEN A PERI PROSTHETIC FRACTURE.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Injury; Pain
MAUDE report 6638959 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K041170, K051738. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0893-2009 · Nov 13, 2008 · TerminatedSecur-Fit Max Hip Stem These devices are modular components of a total hip system. These femoral stems are intended for use with femoral heads and acetabular components in primary
- Z-0894-2009 · Nov 13, 2008 · TerminatedPrimary Secur-fit Plus Max Hip Stem These devices are modular components of a total hip system. These femoral stems are intended for use with femoral heads and acetabular componen
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page