Skip to content

Secur-Fit 1601-05132Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 132 Degree Neck Angle V40 Hip Stem · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Secur-Fit (45)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327021264), received between Apr 17, 2019 and May 21, 2019 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult or Delayed Positioning” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)2
  • Injury2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 21, 2019Migration; Migration

    PRIMARY PROCEDURE, LEFT HIP. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SIZE 5 SECUR-FIT ADVANCED BROACH WAS USED AND SAT PERFECTLY IN SITU. WHEN THE SIZE 5 SECUR-FIT ADVANCED STEM WAS IMPLANTED, IT SUBSIDED. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIZE 6 SECUR-FIT ADVANCED STEM. PROCEDURE WAS TO ADDRESS A FEMORAL FRACTURE, THE REP REPORTED THE FRACTURE WAS NOT A FACTOR IN STEM SUBSIDENCE. THOUGH UNLIKELY, IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE SAME BROACH WAS USED AS IN A PREVIOUS PI WHERE THE SAME EVENT OCCURRED WITH THE SAME SURGEON FOR THE SAME SIZE DEVICES (DIFFERENT PATIENTS).

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Injury

    MAUDE report 8627455 ↗
  • InjuryApr 17, 2019Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Difficult or Delayed Positioning

    SALE REP REPORTED, DURING A HEMI ARTHROPLASTY THE PROSTHESIS RECEDED FURTHER THAN INTENDED. SURGEON STATED THE PROSTHESIS APPEARED TO BE SMALLER THAN THE SIZE 5. SURGEON PROCEEDED WITH A SIZE 6 PROSTHESIS AND COMPLETED SURGERY SUCCESSFULLY. IT WAS NOTED BY THE REP THAT THERE WAS A FRACTURE ON THE BONE AND SUSPECTS THAT THE STEM MOVED DUE TO THE FRACTURE. THERE WAS APPROXIMATELY A 5 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Injury

    MAUDE report 8523464 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page