Trident 690-10-22ERecalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Constrained Acet. Liner · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Trident (160)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327024289), received between May 31, 2019 and Sep 25, 2024 — classified as 7 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (4 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Jul 30, 2026Open, Classified
Affected devices were manufactured with Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) raw material aged in excess of five years. Product has the potential for elevated levels of oxidation, which may result in increased wear, leading to hazards such as excessive wear debris, material fragments, fractured device, or disassociated device. Potential harms include revision surgery, pain, and inflammation.
Z-3201-2026 · Root cause: Process change control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated4
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
Patient problems
- Injury2
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
- Fall1
- Insufficient Information1
- Joint Dislocation1
- Pain1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 25, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISSOCIATION OF THE CONSTRAINED LINER FROM THE SHELL. THE CONSTRAINED LINER AND 22 +5 FEMORAL HEAD WERE REVISED TO A 10° CONSTRAINED LINER AND +10 FEMORAL HEAD. REP CONFIRMED THAT THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED FEMORAL HEAD, AND CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties
MAUDE report 20306648 ↗InjuryJun 13, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT HAS BEEN REPORTED "DISLOCATIONS IN A PATIENT AFTER UNDERGOING TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERY WITH STRYKER PRODUCTS - YEAR 2010."
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 14682286 ↗InjuryMay 26, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISSOCIATION OF THE INNER BIPOLAR COMPONENT FROM THE OUTER COMPONENT OF A CONSTRAINED LINER. THE LINER, FEMORAL HEAD, AND PROXIMAL FEMUR WERE REVISED. REP CONFIRMED THERE WERE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED HEAD, AND THAT THE SURGEON REVISED THE PROXIMAL FEMUR ONLY BECAUSE IT WAS EASY TO REVISE PROPHYLACTICALLY AGAINST INFECTION.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 14506729 ↗InjuryOct 22, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISSOCIATION OF THE CONSTRAINED LINER FROM THE SHELL. ONLY THE CONSTRAINED LINER WAS REVISED. SURGEON REPORTED THAT IMPINGEMENT OF THE PROXIMAL BODY, AND THE SHELL'S POSITION BEING NEUTRAL AS CONTRIBUTING FACTORS FOR REPEATED DISSOCIATION.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 12681837 ↗InjuryApr 26, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED. PATIENT FELL IN 2018 AND HAS HAD PAIN EVER SINCE. A STRYKER CONSTRAINED LINER AND COMPETITOR FEMORAL HEAD WERE REVISED. REP PROVIDED A PRIMARY OPERATIVE REPORT, VISIT NOTES, USAGE SHEET, AND EXAM RESULTS, AND CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Fall; Pain
MAUDE report 11729558 ↗InjuryNov 22, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PATIENT WITH A PREVIOUS THA DISLOCATED. CONSTRAINED LINER DISSOCIATED FROM ACETABULAR SHELL. A NEW CONSTRAINED LINER AND HEAD WERE IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 9365679 ↗InjuryMay 31, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
REP REPORTED "PATIENT IMPLANTED WITH 10* TRIDENT CONSTRAINED ACETABULAR LINER WITH 22MM/0+ INNER HEAD. LINER DISASSOCIATED FROM SHELL UPON PATIENT TRANSFER FROM SURGICAL TABLE TO HOSPITAL BED, POST ANESTHESIA WAKEUP AND SITE CLOSURE. PATIENT HAD TO BE REINDUCED AND RE-OPENED FOR IMMEDIATE REVISION. CONSTRAINED LINER AND INNER HEAD WERE REVISED TO NEW IMPLANTS; SURGEON REQUESTED THAT PRIMARY IMPLANTS BE INVESTIGATED. UPDATE: "NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE HEAD; SURGEON QUESTION LOCKING MECHANISM." RIGHT SIDE.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 8658163 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices
- Novation 134-36-45Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented Or Uncemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-28-650Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer89 reports
- Trident 690-00-28FHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall37 reports
- Trident 690-00-22EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall36 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-652Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer75 reports
- Trident 690-00-22DHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall22 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-654Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer70 reports
- Trident 69-2850Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall11 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page