Skip to content

Trident 690-10-28HRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Constrained Acet. Liner · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Trident (160)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07613327024319), received between Aug 29, 2018 and Aug 29, 2018 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jul 30, 2026Open, Classified

    Affected devices were manufactured with Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) raw material aged in excess of five years. Product has the potential for elevated levels of oxidation, which may result in increased wear, leading to hazards such as excessive wear debris, material fragments, fractured device, or disassociated device. Potential harms include revision surgery, pain, and inflammation.

    Z-3201-2026 · Root cause: Process change control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Injury1
  • Joint Dislocation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 29, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION. SURGEON REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAS NO ABDUCTORS, AND DISLOCATION OCCURRED DUE TO HER NON-COMPLIANCE WITH POST-OPERATIVE INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING TYPES OF ALLOWABLE ACTIVITY - THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE STRYKER DEVICES IMPLANTED. REP REPORTED THAT X-RAYS, MEDICAL RECORDS, AND FURTHER INFORMATION ARE NOT AVAILABLE DUE TO HOSPITAL POLICY.

    Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 7827710 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices

All Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page