Trident 663-10-36ERecalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327024890), received between Nov 12, 2019 and Jan 12, 2023 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryJan 12, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO A GLUTEAL TEAR. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, THE RIM OF THE LINER WAS OBSERVED TO BE WORN/ CRUSHED (SURGEON COULD NOT DETERMINE IF THE WEAR/ CRUSHING WERE CAUSED BY THE FEMORAL HEAD OR THE STEM). A 10° ECENTRIC LINER AND 36 +10 C-TAPER LFIT HEAD WERE REVISED TO A 0° ECENTRIC LINER AND ANOTHER 36 +10 LFIT HEAD. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

  Patient problems: Muscle/Tendon Damage

  MAUDE report 16143614 ↗
• InjuryNov 15, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION OF THE FEMORAL HEAD FROM THE POLY LINER. THE SURGEON COULD OFFER NO EXPLANATION AS TO THE POSSIBLE CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTOR OF THE DISLOCATION, AS THE PATIENT'S ROM WAS TESTED AT 90° PERPENDICULAR TO HER BODY DURING THE REVISION 5 DAYS PRIOR . THE 36 +0 HEAD (IMPLANTED (B)(6) 2019) AND THE 36MM 10° ECCENTRIC LINER (IMPLANTED (B)(6) 2019) WERE REVISED TO A CONSTRAINED LINER AND HEAD. REP WILL PROVIDE REVISION USAGE INFORMATION AND CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

  Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 9329148 ↗
• InjuryNov 12, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  AS REPORTED: "WE REVISED THIS PATIENT AGAIN. SHE WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2019 FOR DISLOCATION. PATIENT DID WELL. UNTIL THIS WEEKEND. SHE DISLOCATED [REP CONFIRMED THE 36 +10 LFIT HEAD CAME OUT OF THE X3 10° LINER, AND REPORTED THAT A CLOSED REDUCTION WAS PERFORMED PRIOR TO REVISION]. SHE WAS REVISED. AT REVISION UNDER ANESTHESIA COULD NOT BE DISLOCATED. THE STEM WAS REVISED TO A RESTORATION MODULAR WITH INCREASED ANTEVERSION. NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE IMPLANTS." SPOKE TO REP, WHO PROVIDED WEBOPS REPORT FROM PRIOR REVISION AND USAGE SHEET FROM CURRENT REVISION. REP CONFIRMED NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE AVAILABLE.

  Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 9311694 ↗